the problem with any other theory is the make no sense
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM
I think it is crazy that people have trouble believing the jumbo jet we saw hit the building is the reason the reason the building fell but they seem willing to entertain the idea that some grand conspiracy that would have needed to include dozens if not hundreds of people is reasonable. I have yet to hear a theory that even come close to making any sense. Someone planted explosives in the building then recruited terrorist to hijack planes and fly them into the buildings? They knew they were going to hit the building and planted explosives in the buildings to make sure they went down? The motive element is where we see how truly stupid the theory is. Supposedly they did it to justify the war in Iraq but it never occurred to them to do it a way that linked Iraq to the attack????? If they were willing to kill 3000 Americans and send the economy into a tail spin wouldn't they have been willing to fake WMD's and a tie with Iraq?
I think the idea that we didn't really land on the moon has firmer footing than the "buildings can't fall like that" theory.
I think the idea that we didn't really land on the moon has firmer footing than the "buildings can't fall like that" theory.
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools.
- 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM
1425 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools.
- 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM
960 Views
Ugh.
- 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM
1002 Views
Re: Ugh.
- 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM
927 Views
Something tells me that no matter who answered your questions you wouldn't believe anyway.
- 21/09/2011 02:16:52 AM
916 Views
this is a controlled demolition
- 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM
1044 Views
I've seen controlled demolitions in person. They happen in the opposite order of the WTC collapses.
- 21/09/2011 03:54:35 AM
1002 Views
Agreed
- 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM
923 Views
I've long advocated this for the reasons Tom states as well as others.
- 21/09/2011 06:49:28 AM
860 Views
I don't know if the Internet is degrading skills, or just giving stupid people a voice
- 20/09/2011 02:33:24 PM
994 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed
- 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM
984 Views
No, there is not.
- 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM
1090 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least
- 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM
956 Views
As far as conspiracies go ...
- 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM
1055 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid?
- 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM
861 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist.
- 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM
909 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11
- 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM
929 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence.
- 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM
997 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed
- 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM
966 Views
But that's what I DID argue.
- 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM
947 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms
- 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM
995 Views
I've always seen them as separate.
- 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM
814 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member.
- 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM
1044 Views
I'm still annoyed.
- 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM
849 Views
I stopped responfding when suddenly realized I didn't want to be in a Bush Iraq war debate
- 21/09/2011 02:53:29 PM
854 Views
and I pointed that it was was just continuin gthe Clinton policy
- 21/09/2011 02:30:13 PM
936 Views
Even if that were true, it would still be flip flopping on a central Bush platform plank.
- 21/09/2011 05:45:10 PM
978 Views
In addition:
- 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM
1058 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense
- 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM
929 Views
Contemplate this....
- 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM
951 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me
- 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM
971 Views
- 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM
971 Views
You should watch the pilot episode of the X-Files spin-off series The Lone Gunmen.
- 20/09/2011 08:19:15 PM
988 Views
Make 'em all take debate.
- 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM
922 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools.
- 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM
954 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...?
- 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM
922 Views
Not actually the best example
- 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM
913 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building?
- 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM
933 Views
The fireproofing was scraped off the steel by the crash, so the beams melted.
- 21/09/2011 07:35:08 PM
1133 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...?
- 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM
965 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses?
- 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM
988 Views
You could still argue.
- 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM
865 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person
- 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM
883 Views
- 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM
883 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math.
- 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM
878 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid.
- 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM
1140 Views
I really and truly appreciate your love of pure math for math's sake, but...
- 21/09/2011 11:10:03 PM
908 Views
Well, it requires a lot more science to really dispute things than HS can give someone
- 21/09/2011 11:28:29 PM
928 Views
