Active Users:485 Time:02/05/2025 03:28:14 PM
Re: And how did you know... Timthetrolloc Send a noteboard - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM
that the video was produced using real science by real scientists who didn't have an agenda?

That's my thing with conspiracy theory people. They have an agenda, and as such, everything they do, advocate, and propose is suspect.

~Jeordam


The gov't is the one with the agenda, and that agenda could be anything with the pressure they are put under by big business.

Conspiracy theory people tend to just want the truth. I want to see some better scientific studies and tend to only pay attention to people who look at the problem scientifically. The official explanation does not ,in my opinion, even come close to explaining how these steel structures fell almost directly in there own footprint as in a controlled demolition. Controlled demolitions are not caused by fires. They are caused by carefully controlled explosions throughout the whole building.
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1284 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 832 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 863 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 787 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 902 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 820 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 741 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 903 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 779 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 830 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 935 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 816 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 886 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 733 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 745 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 795 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 854 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 841 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 817 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 822 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 682 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 829 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 787 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 893 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 725 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 754 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 858 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 867 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 814 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 847 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 799 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 825 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 857 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 845 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 792 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 813 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 805 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 906 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 897 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 745 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 821 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 789 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 906 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 377 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 756 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 797 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 779 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 772 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 819 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 793 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 416 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 840 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 692 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 861 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 724 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 760 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 799 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 733 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 854 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 412 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 757 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 328 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 998 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 795 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 964 Views

Reply to Message