Active Users:375 Time:17/06/2025 12:16:29 AM
Re: And how did you know... Timthetrolloc Send a noteboard - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM
that the video was produced using real science by real scientists who didn't have an agenda?

That's my thing with conspiracy theory people. They have an agenda, and as such, everything they do, advocate, and propose is suspect.

~Jeordam


The gov't is the one with the agenda, and that agenda could be anything with the pressure they are put under by big business.

Conspiracy theory people tend to just want the truth. I want to see some better scientific studies and tend to only pay attention to people who look at the problem scientifically. The official explanation does not ,in my opinion, even come close to explaining how these steel structures fell almost directly in there own footprint as in a controlled demolition. Controlled demolitions are not caused by fires. They are caused by carefully controlled explosions throughout the whole building.
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1299 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 845 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 873 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 800 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 920 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 854 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 751 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 915 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 790 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 845 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 949 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 831 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 897 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 746 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 756 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 810 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 866 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 850 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 831 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 834 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 695 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 841 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 802 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 903 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 739 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 767 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 893 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 878 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 828 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 856 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 809 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 840 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 874 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 877 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 803 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 825 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 817 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 920 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 912 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 762 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 835 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 802 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 918 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 382 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 769 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 811 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 792 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 787 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 829 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 807 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 421 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 850 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 708 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 875 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 738 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 775 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 812 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 748 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 868 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 418 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 766 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 335 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 1012 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 807 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 978 Views

Reply to Message