Active Users:1141 Time:02/11/2025 11:01:49 PM
I stopped responfding when suddenly realized I didn't want to be in a Bush Iraq war debate random thoughts Send a noteboard - 21/09/2011 02:53:29 PM
It is old territory and no one wins. Bush had a lot of neocons on his staff that is true. Those neocons supported Clinton's regiume change policy and pushed for him to be more aggressive that is also true. They trended to be supporters of Israel and Hussein was paying rewards to the families of suicide bombers in Palestine so they didn't really like him. There were some who wanted to attack Iraq for the gross violations of the armistice agreement and for kicking out inspectors. That is also true. That there was a burning desire in the Bush administration to attack Iraq is a conspiracy theory BS backed more by emotion that facts.

Lets be honest there is very little chance of me convincing you there was not some plot to attack Iraq.
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1349 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 896 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 924 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 848 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 964 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 907 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 806 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 966 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 851 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 904 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 999 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 873 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 977 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 795 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 837 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 851 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 915 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 893 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 871 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 909 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 740 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 900 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 840 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 964 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 778 Views
I stopped responfding when suddenly realized I didn't want to be in a Bush Iraq war debate - 21/09/2011 02:53:29 PM 784 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 817 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 974 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 920 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 870 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 913 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 860 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 886 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 949 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 921 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 843 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 867 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 885 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 966 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 961 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 822 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 896 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 842 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 976 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 405 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 842 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 866 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 860 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 834 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 869 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 864 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 452 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 892 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 756 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 914 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 789 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 814 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 879 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 796 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 935 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 435 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 834 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 379 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 1060 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 857 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 1032 Views

Reply to Message