Active Users:702 Time:19/12/2025 06:56:02 PM
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again. Joel Send a noteboard - 09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM
He needs to learn to pick a horse and ride it instead of starting from a compromised position then fleeing to the right when they attack it. That scores no points and allays no fears with them, it just ensures the liberal base vital to his re-election is as enraged as the conservative base waiting for the GOP to tell them who to elect.

In this case, I happen to think it wrong to force private, particularly religious, institutions with a stated opposition to contraception to nonetheless pay for it. I would like a little clarification; an HHS "policy" or "rule" is not a federal LAW, so I am unsure what we are talking about here. Is it something that truly requires religious employers to pay for contraception, or another one of those "the feds partially fund you and you will not receive that money unless you do x" deals?

Politically though Obama is just doing another masterful job making the worst of a bad situation and outraging the entire political spectrum with a single issue.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up - 09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM 1949 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again. - 09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM 973 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor - 10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM 874 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well. - 09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM 1046 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources! *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM 679 Views
Is there really such a thing? *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:11:30 PM 592 Views
You lost all credibility in the first line of your post. - 09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM 988 Views
The subject line didn't help. *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:04:11 PM 622 Views
But it added some flair to the discussion! *NM* - 09/02/2012 07:46:47 PM 563 Views
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM 570 Views
It's one thing to have a bias. - 09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM 1028 Views
Some would say putting a spotlight on it is more honest. *NM* - 09/02/2012 09:34:17 PM 542 Views
Ah, the Rupert Murdoch School of Objectivity. - 09/02/2012 10:15:57 PM 964 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms. - 09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM 830 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly. - 10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM 1844 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention? - 10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM 2294 Views
If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote. - 10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM 2340 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course. - 11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM 2143 Views
Bullshit. - 11/02/2012 04:29:31 AM 2499 Views
A vote for no one is a vote for more BS. - 11/02/2012 05:55:11 AM 2210 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end. - 10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM 2403 Views
He is already preparing to cave. - 10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM 2367 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said. - 10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM 2162 Views
"And here I thought he was just another politician." - 10/02/2012 01:29:36 PM 2240 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved. - 10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM 2374 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions? - 10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM 938 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs. - 10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM 1117 Views
Money is not the same as speech! - 10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM 840 Views
No it isn't Joel, empirically you are dead wrong - 10/02/2012 11:24:19 PM 1119 Views
One last point - 10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM 1194 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes. - 11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM 938 Views
You argument does not make sense - 11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM 831 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency. - 11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM 944 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality - 11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM 1095 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM 1064 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM 2268 Views
In other words, I could. - 11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM 781 Views
Some more points - 11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM 1081 Views
Sex is not a necessity either. - 11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM 1057 Views
I can't believe you just said that - 11/02/2012 04:30:12 AM 862 Views
The widespread inability to believe that is deeply worrisome. - 11/02/2012 06:33:01 AM 1084 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a in it ) - 11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM 1090 Views
Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained. - 11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM 1007 Views
The polls disagree with you. - 11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM 949 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls. - 11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM 1019 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway - 11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM 1110 Views
I haven't really heard about it outside of this post, so the negative exposure can't be too bad. - 11/02/2012 05:56:58 PM 820 Views
you have, sort of. - 11/02/2012 08:23:25 PM 1061 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is - 11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM 988 Views
Nossy that was not Joel, that was me - 11/02/2012 01:56:39 PM 997 Views
I know that. - 11/02/2012 03:23:32 PM 1041 Views
Understood. - 11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM 922 Views
mmm... - 11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM 1015 Views

Reply to Message