Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said.
callandor1000 Send a noteboard - 10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM
A politician doing something that is right, that he thinks is right, and isn't there for self gain. Wow. Bold move. I like it. And here I thought he was just another politician. We may just have the right guy in office.
He always does. Once again he offered a half measure expecting to be hailed as a moderate uniter, got blowback from the right, then publicly pledged defiance while just as publicly preparing retreat. Within a few weeks we will be in the classic Obama end game of increasingly half hearted speeches while sending flunkies to negotiate with the most influential conservative leaders before unconditional surrender. After that only the post mortem remains:
1) Conservatives who have always hated Obama and always will, no matter how he grovels,
2) Liberals infuriated he betrayed them yet again,
3) Moderates and independents who elected him to "pull the car out of the ditch" and wonder why it is still there three years later and
4) Obama looking around at them all mournfully wondering, Why do they all despise me...?

The healthcare debate set the tone; it is only fitting leaving "public" healthcare in private hands forces him to repeatedly re-enact that for the rest of his presidency.
You, sir, are utterly ridiculous.
You said a lot of pointless garbage. All I said was that I'm glad Obama is finally doing something right. I personally don't even necessarily want a president who wants the same things as me. I am willing to admit unlike most people that in the end I know jack shit about many things. So what I think is that I'd like to pick a president who I think has the best chance of doing the right things or doing things with something other than self preservation or advancement in mind. Obama made a move like that. I tip my hat to him. Thats all I was saying. I tip my hat to Obama.
Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.
My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up
09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM
- 1779 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again.
09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM
- 812 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor
10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM
- 699 Views
In general, I disagree with that view, but not in this particular case.
11/02/2012 02:02:42 AM
- 926 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well.
09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM
- 885 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources!
*NM*
09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM
- 612 Views

Wanting both parties to be hit by a bus does not make one non-partisan.
09/02/2012 10:05:28 PM
- 761 Views

You lost all credibility in the first line of your post.
09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM
- 823 Views
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM*
09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM
- 503 Views
It's one thing to have a bias.
09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM
- 859 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms.
09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM
- 675 Views
The Catholic Church wants to eliminate the birth control coverage requirement entirely.
10/02/2012 12:24:01 AM
- 975 Views
Sounds like they just do not want Catholics directly financing; great argument for public healthcare
10/02/2012 02:27:36 AM
- 921 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly.
10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM
- 1697 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention?
10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM
- 2129 Views

If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote.
10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM
- 2163 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course.
11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM
- 1980 Views
No everynametaken this is not unconsitutional according to the first ammendment
11/02/2012 12:14:29 AM
- 1972 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end.
10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM
- 2221 Views
He is already preparing to cave.
10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM
- 2203 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said.
10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM
- 2002 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved.
10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM
- 2223 Views
Yup, the cave already happened.....you could have set your watch to this! *NM*
10/02/2012 05:00:02 PM
- 1695 Views
Actually, no, I could not; I expected it to take another week or two.
11/02/2012 01:27:31 AM
- 2106 Views
No, you don't have to buy it from insurers. You get it for free, just like everyone else will. *NM*
10/02/2012 09:55:53 PM
- 1838 Views
"The employees can then buy the coverage directly from an insurer."
11/02/2012 01:25:52 AM
- 2217 Views
Then that article is wrong.
11/02/2012 01:43:40 AM
- 2161 Views
Two days ago the White House said it would not back down from requiring school/hospital compliance.
11/02/2012 01:57:50 AM
- 2131 Views
So in summary... the article you posted was wrong.
11/02/2012 02:18:00 AM
- 1696 Views
To soon to tell, but if you think so feel free to demand a correction from them.
11/02/2012 03:12:40 AM
- 919 Views
Losing the exchanges is a pretty big loss
11/02/2012 03:30:15 AM
- 826 Views
So they refuse to cover it for the next two years, then do an about face in 2014.
11/02/2012 03:57:53 AM
- 994 Views
If Aetna does not provide the free contraception as part of the compromise
11/02/2012 02:46:14 AM
- 700 Views
Yeah, I saw that; if Aetna does not do as Obama says by 2014 they lose out on free profits then.
11/02/2012 03:13:36 AM
- 762 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions?
10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM
- 781 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs.
10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM
- 957 Views
Money is not the same as speech!
10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM
- 677 Views
And actions are different from both—until others are expected to pay for ones actions.
11/02/2012 12:53:40 AM
- 942 Views
No it isn't Joel, empirically you are dead wrong
10/02/2012 11:24:19 PM
- 924 Views
I do not see how requiring private entities do it instead of the feds is "least restrictive way."
11/02/2012 12:53:22 AM
- 909 Views
Catholic Charities of Sacramento Inc. v. Superior Court
11/02/2012 01:21:46 AM
- 843 Views
"the Court found that it wasn't a religious organization, it was just a non-profit corporation."
11/02/2012 01:36:33 AM
- 706 Views
One last point
10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM
- 1014 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes.
11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM
- 795 Views
You argument does not make sense
11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM
- 676 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency.
11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM
- 799 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality
11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM
- 908 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money?
11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM
- 864 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money?
11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM
- 2097 Views
In other words, I could.
11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM
- 599 Views
You believe it can't help people since it is not single payer? *NM*
11/02/2012 04:31:13 AM
- 516 Views
Since you answered this in your other response I will just adress it there. *MN*
11/02/2012 05:59:37 AM
- 867 Views
Some more points
11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM
- 928 Views
Sex is not a necessity either.
11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM
- 876 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a
in it )
11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM
- 903 Views

Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained.
11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM
- 828 Views
The polls disagree with you.
11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM
- 791 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls.
11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM
- 838 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway
11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
- 965 Views
Frankly, I hope Obamacare DOES die, just not because of the public mandate.
11/02/2012 07:18:04 AM
- 833 Views
I haven't really heard about it outside of this post, so the negative exposure can't be too bad.
11/02/2012 05:56:58 PM
- 658 Views
There seems to be plenty of Hell raising over it, but you are in the States and I am not.
11/02/2012 07:55:51 PM
- 674 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is
11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM
- 834 Views
Understood.
11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM
- 783 Views
mmm...
11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM
- 842 Views
The man talked about during the campaign was the one elected with a mandate.
12/02/2012 02:28:15 AM
- 989 Views
I think Obama (for once) was far more clever you give him credit for...
15/02/2012 05:11:10 PM
- 1050 Views
Surrendering on liberal issues then blaming Republicans is not just Obamas strategy, but his POLICY.
15/02/2012 07:23:04 PM
- 899 Views