Sex may not be a need to the rational mind, but it is a driving force of our nature. Sex is part of what is to be human. Sex drive and sexual needs are different to each person, many people need sexual release. I can't believe you just said that the poor shouldn't have sex. Should they just eat their babies too? (yes I probably just ended the conversation right there with invoking Godwin)
It is a not a payment issue and it is a privacy issue. I can't believe you can't see that. The issue is not how much does the insurance plan cost but the privacy issue about the Church wanting to stop contraception.
I am sorry but I do not see it this way. By the church paying for my insurance but not allow me to have a choice in my insurance, they are dictating what I can and can't spend my money on.
1/3rd of what an employer spends on an employee are benefits unrelated to direct pay but instead are "benefits" The largest benefit by far is health insurance. People can't pick and choose their health insurance plan since they instead get whatever their company chooses for them. The main reason why wages for individuals are flat since the 1970s is not due to lack of productivity increases (we have had a lot of those), no the reason is health cares costs have gone up and instead of the boss giving you a raise or a bonus he instead paid that 15% health insurance premium increase.
It is a not a payment issue and it is a privacy issue. I can't believe you can't see that. The issue is not how much does the insurance plan cost but the privacy issue about the Church wanting to stop contraception.
Oh, it is nothing like that and you know it. Once they pay you the money is yours, not theirs. We are talking about how they spend money that was NEVER yours, but ALWAYS theirs until they paid it to an insurer. They are wholly within their rights to decide what they will and will not pay that insurer to do. If the insurer decides, for whatever reason, to provide contraception coverage with some of their profits IN ADDITION TO what they have contracted with the church to provide, they are as free to do so as I am to buy porn with my pay once it BECOMES my pay. I just hope the reduced pregnancy costs and lure of the insurance exchange is enough incentive for them to do that, because otherwise they will refuse and there is little anyone can do about it.
I am sorry but I do not see it this way. By the church paying for my insurance but not allow me to have a choice in my insurance, they are dictating what I can and can't spend my money on.
1/3rd of what an employer spends on an employee are benefits unrelated to direct pay but instead are "benefits" The largest benefit by far is health insurance. People can't pick and choose their health insurance plan since they instead get whatever their company chooses for them. The main reason why wages for individuals are flat since the 1970s is not due to lack of productivity increases (we have had a lot of those), no the reason is health cares costs have gone up and instead of the boss giving you a raise or a bonus he instead paid that 15% health insurance premium increase.
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up
- 09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM
1900 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again.
- 09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM
927 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor
- 10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM
815 Views
In general, I disagree with that view, but not in this particular case.
- 11/02/2012 02:02:42 AM
1049 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well.
- 09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM
995 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources! 
*NM*
- 09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM
665 Views
*NM*
- 09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM
665 Views
Wanting both parties to be hit by a bus does not make one non-partisan.
- 09/02/2012 10:05:28 PM
882 Views
- 09/02/2012 10:05:28 PM
882 Views
You lost all credibility in the first line of your post.
- 09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM
942 Views
*NM*
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM*
- 09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM
555 Views
It's one thing to have a bias.
- 09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM
983 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms.
- 09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM
794 Views
The Catholic Church wants to eliminate the birth control coverage requirement entirely.
- 10/02/2012 12:24:01 AM
1102 Views
Sounds like they just do not want Catholics directly financing; great argument for public healthcare
- 10/02/2012 02:27:36 AM
1049 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly.
- 10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM
1804 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention?
- 10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM
2245 Views
- 10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM
2245 Views
If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote.
- 10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM
2289 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course.
- 11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM
2098 Views
No everynametaken this is not unconsitutional according to the first ammendment
- 11/02/2012 12:14:29 AM
2100 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end.
- 10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM
2344 Views
He is already preparing to cave.
- 10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM
2334 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said.
- 10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM
2114 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved.
- 10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM
2335 Views
Yup, the cave already happened.....you could have set your watch to this! *NM*
- 10/02/2012 05:00:02 PM
1751 Views
Actually, no, I could not; I expected it to take another week or two.
- 11/02/2012 01:27:31 AM
2214 Views
No, you don't have to buy it from insurers. You get it for free, just like everyone else will. *NM*
- 10/02/2012 09:55:53 PM
1892 Views
"The employees can then buy the coverage directly from an insurer."
- 11/02/2012 01:25:52 AM
2339 Views
Then that article is wrong.
- 11/02/2012 01:43:40 AM
2282 Views
Two days ago the White House said it would not back down from requiring school/hospital compliance.
- 11/02/2012 01:57:50 AM
2263 Views
So in summary... the article you posted was wrong.
- 11/02/2012 02:18:00 AM
1820 Views
To soon to tell, but if you think so feel free to demand a correction from them.
- 11/02/2012 03:12:40 AM
1041 Views
Losing the exchanges is a pretty big loss
- 11/02/2012 03:30:15 AM
959 Views
So they refuse to cover it for the next two years, then do an about face in 2014.
- 11/02/2012 03:57:53 AM
1128 Views
If Aetna does not provide the free contraception as part of the compromise
- 11/02/2012 02:46:14 AM
813 Views
Yeah, I saw that; if Aetna does not do as Obama says by 2014 they lose out on free profits then.
- 11/02/2012 03:13:36 AM
866 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions?
- 10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM
896 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs.
- 10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM
1082 Views
Money is not the same as speech!
- 10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM
799 Views
And actions are different from both—until others are expected to pay for ones actions.
- 11/02/2012 12:53:40 AM
1069 Views
No it isn't Joel, empirically you are dead wrong
- 10/02/2012 11:24:19 PM
1048 Views
I do not see how requiring private entities do it instead of the feds is "least restrictive way."
- 11/02/2012 12:53:22 AM
1055 Views
Catholic Charities of Sacramento Inc. v. Superior Court
- 11/02/2012 01:21:46 AM
962 Views
"the Court found that it wasn't a religious organization, it was just a non-profit corporation."
- 11/02/2012 01:36:33 AM
835 Views
One last point
- 10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM
1143 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes.
- 11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM
916 Views
You argument does not make sense
- 11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM
796 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency.
- 11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM
915 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality
- 11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM
1031 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money?
- 11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM
990 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money?
- 11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM
2213 Views
In other words, I could.
- 11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM
725 Views
You believe it can't help people since it is not single payer? *NM*
- 11/02/2012 04:31:13 AM
572 Views
Since you answered this in your other response I will just adress it there. *MN*
- 11/02/2012 05:59:37 AM
982 Views
Some more points
- 11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM
1043 Views
Sex is not a necessity either.
- 11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM
1003 Views
I can't believe you just said that
- 11/02/2012 04:30:12 AM
834 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a 
in it )
- 11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM
1031 Views
in it )
- 11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM
1031 Views
Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained.
- 11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM
961 Views
The polls disagree with you.
- 11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM
902 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls.
- 11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM
956 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway
- 11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
1076 Views
Frankly, I hope Obamacare DOES die, just not because of the public mandate.
- 11/02/2012 07:18:04 AM
965 Views
I haven't really heard about it outside of this post, so the negative exposure can't be too bad.
- 11/02/2012 05:56:58 PM
765 Views
There seems to be plenty of Hell raising over it, but you are in the States and I am not.
- 11/02/2012 07:55:51 PM
802 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is
- 11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM
956 Views
Understood.
- 11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM
894 Views
mmm...
- 11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM
955 Views
The man talked about during the campaign was the one elected with a mandate.
- 12/02/2012 02:28:15 AM
1102 Views
I think Obama (for once) was far more clever you give him credit for...
- 15/02/2012 05:11:10 PM
1180 Views
Surrendering on liberal issues then blaming Republicans is not just Obamas strategy, but his POLICY.
- 15/02/2012 07:23:04 PM
1016 Views