I love your last two sentences. They're a really nice description. *NM*
Rebekah Send a noteboard - 20/09/2012 07:58:19 PM
I do not agree with you at all that the passage could mean anything other than what the scholars are claiming. The "Bride of Christ" language always uses the word "bride" because this mirrors the "Bride of God" language of the prophets when used to describe Israel. I even looked, and looked, and found one place where the word "wife" is used in Revelation, but it's a bad translation, because the Greek original uses "bride" and not "wife" there as well. I then followed all those passages in the Coptic and they are uniform in the use of "bride". There is a very good reason, too - the relationship between Christ and His Church is ever fresh and new, always a celebration and a feast; he is forever the bridegroom and the Church is forever the bride. The "honeymoon" never ends.
*MySmiley*
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
So, about this silly "Jesus' wife" story making the rounds...
19/09/2012 10:55:55 PM
- 1174 Views
That's right! Jesus' position on marriage was "One man, no woman." *NM*
19/09/2012 11:05:55 PM
- 517 Views
What is the context? The canonical bible says Christ has a wife: The Church.
19/09/2012 11:25:19 PM
- 796 Views
Oh please...don't confuse "wife" with "bride"
19/09/2012 11:35:09 PM
- 762 Views
What word do the Prophets use for Israels relationship to God?
20/09/2012 12:38:20 AM
- 770 Views
BRIDE
20/09/2012 03:39:30 PM
- 748 Views
I love your last two sentences. They're a really nice description. *NM*
20/09/2012 07:58:19 PM
- 372 Views
That makes sense for an eternal God, but sounds like a wife who remains a bride.
20/09/2012 08:56:07 PM
- 824 Views
It's "bride" in the Old Testament as well.
20/09/2012 09:48:37 PM
- 760 Views
The distinction is important for preserving the newlywed condition, but not for this fragment.
20/09/2012 11:21:52 PM
- 810 Views
Two things why it is important
20/09/2012 04:24:37 AM
- 745 Views
Did someone hit you over the head? "Two things why it is important"? Really?
20/09/2012 03:50:02 PM
- 796 Views
Something I forgot to ask you about last night: What is your take on Daniels messianic prophecy?
20/09/2012 09:21:32 PM
- 740 Views
I don't get that at all. "And will be no more", or "And will have nothing" is better.
20/09/2012 10:13:20 PM
- 694 Views
It is the King James text, which I have never heard anyone call heretical.
20/09/2012 11:15:54 PM
- 775 Views
The King James Bible is aesthetically pleasing but a bad translation.
21/09/2012 12:03:00 AM
- 709 Views
I like the NKJV because it tries to include all ambiguities.
21/09/2012 12:47:38 AM
- 772 Views
There is a very good reason no one dismissed the illegitmate gospels as illegitimate until 180 AD:
20/09/2012 09:15:05 PM
- 681 Views
The Gospel of Thomas was written before 180 AD.
20/09/2012 09:33:44 PM
- 694 Views
What is the oldest extant text of or reference to it?
20/09/2012 11:11:03 PM
- 766 Views
The Oxyrhynchus fragments were dated to c. 200 AD, and they are copies
21/09/2012 12:18:33 AM
- 664 Views
I would buy 200 AD, of course.
21/09/2012 12:58:32 AM
- 745 Views
It's not about "buying" it - it's essentially proven at that point.
21/09/2012 03:26:50 AM
- 707 Views
Yes; all I meant was that I never disputed a date around 200 AD.
22/09/2012 12:25:41 AM
- 722 Views
I don't think any of the gospels were written by their purported authors.
22/09/2012 03:36:32 AM
- 663 Views
Not even Mark or Luke?
22/09/2012 01:21:24 PM
- 682 Views
Well, but everyone knew Peter didn't speak Greek
22/09/2012 09:46:57 PM
- 638 Views
True, but everyone also knew Paul spoke it fluently, and he would have been an ideal choice.
24/09/2012 06:20:22 AM
- 697 Views
Some people did "lie big".
24/09/2012 02:11:58 PM
- 729 Views
I forgot about (or possibly repressed memories of) the Gnostics "Gospel" of Peter.
24/09/2012 11:26:43 PM
- 792 Views
I'm not trying to defend Gnosticism doctrinally, but...
24/09/2012 11:51:40 PM
- 760 Views
I am not relying SOLELY (or chiefly) on popularity though.
25/09/2012 02:21:01 AM
- 718 Views
The Gnostic response would be:
25/09/2012 06:01:58 AM
- 660 Views
That just sounds like more conspiracy allegations based on desire rather than evidence.
25/09/2012 07:15:06 AM
- 814 Views
The issue of evidence for Gnosticism would make this thread unnecessarily long.
25/09/2012 07:28:22 PM
- 630 Views
What about those who postulate a mid-to-late 1st century composition?
22/09/2012 02:21:18 AM
- 779 Views
Elaine Pagels ceased to be an impartial academic a long time ago.
22/09/2012 03:41:41 AM
- 713 Views
Suspected as much, but wanted to see if you thought so as well
22/09/2012 03:47:05 AM
- 855 Views
Let's not get started on Funk
22/09/2012 09:48:05 PM
- 659 Views
don't these people have anything better to do?
20/09/2012 11:39:35 PM
- 691 Views
Clearly not.
22/09/2012 12:27:29 AM
- 602 Views