Active Users:799 Time:01/06/2026 10:10:14 AM
Suspected as much, but wanted to see if you thought so as well Larry Send a noteboard - 22/09/2012 03:47:05 AM
I think she became a proponent of Gnosticism quite some time ago, and now she writes the same book over and over again, which can be summed up as, "Christianity isn't what you think it is. It's all about you, and the terrible Church hierarchy wants to keep you down and hold you back." It's a very New-Age sort of spin on Christianity that even the ancient Gnostics would probably not approve of.

As such, she's "all in" on Gnostic Christianity being the "authentic" Christianity. I think most scholars would disagree with a First Century composition for Thomas, and certainly few would argue that John is responding to Thomas.


Like I said, I was skeptical of the claims I cited, but I could see where a 90-130 publication is plausible. I think I can already presume that you think even less of the Robert W. Funk group, right?
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
So, about this silly "Jesus' wife" story making the rounds... - 19/09/2012 10:55:55 PM 1471 Views
That's right! Jesus' position on marriage was "One man, no woman." *NM* - 19/09/2012 11:05:55 PM 720 Views
What is the context? The canonical bible says Christ has a wife: The Church. - 19/09/2012 11:25:19 PM 1091 Views
Oh please...don't confuse "wife" with "bride" - 19/09/2012 11:35:09 PM 1058 Views
What word do the Prophets use for Israels relationship to God? - 20/09/2012 12:38:20 AM 1043 Views
BRIDE - 20/09/2012 03:39:30 PM 1020 Views
Two things why it is important - 20/09/2012 04:24:37 AM 1016 Views
There is a very good reason no one dismissed the illegitmate gospels as illegitimate until 180 AD: - 20/09/2012 09:15:05 PM 969 Views
The Gospel of Thomas was written before 180 AD. - 20/09/2012 09:33:44 PM 972 Views
What is the oldest extant text of or reference to it? - 20/09/2012 11:11:03 PM 1045 Views
The Oxyrhynchus fragments were dated to c. 200 AD, and they are copies - 21/09/2012 12:18:33 AM 999 Views
I would buy 200 AD, of course. - 21/09/2012 12:58:32 AM 1023 Views
It's not about "buying" it - it's essentially proven at that point. - 21/09/2012 03:26:50 AM 1015 Views
Yes; all I meant was that I never disputed a date around 200 AD. - 22/09/2012 12:25:41 AM 998 Views
I don't think any of the gospels were written by their purported authors. - 22/09/2012 03:36:32 AM 930 Views
Not even Mark or Luke? - 22/09/2012 01:21:24 PM 1009 Views
Well, but everyone knew Peter didn't speak Greek - 22/09/2012 09:46:57 PM 925 Views
True, but everyone also knew Paul spoke it fluently, and he would have been an ideal choice. - 24/09/2012 06:20:22 AM 978 Views
Some people did "lie big". - 24/09/2012 02:11:58 PM 991 Views
I forgot about (or possibly repressed memories of) the Gnostics "Gospel" of Peter. - 24/09/2012 11:26:43 PM 1100 Views
I'm not trying to defend Gnosticism doctrinally, but... - 24/09/2012 11:51:40 PM 1033 Views
I am not relying SOLELY (or chiefly) on popularity though. - 25/09/2012 02:21:01 AM 1036 Views
The Gnostic response would be: - 25/09/2012 06:01:58 AM 940 Views
What about those who postulate a mid-to-late 1st century composition? - 22/09/2012 02:21:18 AM 1029 Views
Elaine Pagels ceased to be an impartial academic a long time ago. - 22/09/2012 03:41:41 AM 999 Views
Suspected as much, but wanted to see if you thought so as well - 22/09/2012 03:47:05 AM 1145 Views
Let's not get started on Funk - 22/09/2012 09:48:05 PM 934 Views
So true - 22/09/2012 10:23:08 PM 1025 Views
don't these people have anything better to do? - 20/09/2012 11:39:35 PM 1029 Views
Clearly not. - 22/09/2012 12:27:29 AM 867 Views
then i'll escape this thread before anyone twigs - 22/09/2012 08:12:37 PM 1103 Views
Too late, I have already twigged, branched and treed. - 22/09/2012 08:58:39 PM 1012 Views
I know! - 21/09/2012 06:48:33 AM 1236 Views
See, Tom, you made a mistake. - 22/09/2012 10:25:22 AM 1007 Views

Reply to Message