These people should be executed because of what they have done, not because of who they are. They plotted to kill thousands of Americans and then executed that plot. They were apprehended in the course of a war against their armed irregular group. To say they are entitled to "life and liberty" is patently absurd - the preamble to the Constitution has no legal force, and even if it did, it is obvious that its "protections" would not apply to enemies of the nation intent upon its destruction. Indeed, the one thing one isn't allowed to do is attempt to overthrow the government, yet this group seeks to do that, among other atrocities.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
No need to interrogate Osama bin Laden?
20/11/2009 12:48:27 AM
- 1182 Views
oO uhm, what?
20/11/2009 12:54:13 AM
- 664 Views
If they're tried INSIDE the US, then yes, they are entitled to due process.
20/11/2009 01:44:08 AM
- 568 Views
Yeah, a lot of people were fuzzy on that till this started.
20/11/2009 09:30:39 AM
- 688 Views
on the other hand, we're more than willing to take them out back with a confession.
20/11/2009 06:34:12 PM
- 684 Views
New York is now asking for $75 MILLION for the KSM trial
20/11/2009 01:43:26 AM
- 617 Views
If this trial were being held in any other country
20/11/2009 01:56:07 AM
- 633 Views
It's a terrible precedent no matter how you look at it.
20/11/2009 02:13:46 AM
- 656 Views
It IS a terrible precdent, hence you and others are citing it 65 years after WWII ended.
20/11/2009 09:23:45 AM
- 548 Views
Spare me the bullshit.
20/11/2009 01:57:16 PM
- 549 Views
I will if you will.
20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM
- 673 Views

No, you won't. You never will.
20/11/2009 06:14:30 PM
- 544 Views
You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem.
23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM
- 631 Views
You don't think this is a military struggle? Wow.
20/11/2009 02:52:26 PM
- 612 Views
Allow me to point out...
20/11/2009 03:02:33 PM
- 580 Views
That's the thing, they aren't a terrorist group
20/11/2009 04:54:31 PM
- 621 Views
It would help if you would offer any argument in favour of your stance.
20/11/2009 08:43:08 PM
- 562 Views
I only use the word army cause I can't think of a better one
21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM
- 592 Views

Military struggles involve militaries.
20/11/2009 03:23:14 PM
- 733 Views
Once again, bullshit.
20/11/2009 06:09:31 PM
- 699 Views
This is wrong
20/11/2009 07:41:35 PM
- 596 Views
We're a long way from the shore of Tripoli.
23/11/2009 05:59:19 AM
- 652 Views
Your little diatribe in the beginning only makes me glad...
22/11/2009 05:32:57 AM
- 720 Views
I understand your "jihadist narrative"
22/11/2009 06:36:41 PM
- 703 Views
No you don't
22/11/2009 11:16:18 PM
- 640 Views
Oh, so you know better than Army attorneys about Miranda rights?
22/11/2009 11:52:00 PM
- 674 Views
I can explain it to you right now if you want?
23/11/2009 08:21:48 AM
- 595 Views
Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
23/11/2009 02:56:19 PM
- 674 Views
Re: Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
24/11/2009 04:55:12 AM
- 790 Views
I'm glad that you will never be in a position where a decision you make can affect my life.
23/11/2009 12:27:35 AM
- 542 Views
Actually people of my thinking are already making decisions that affect your life.
23/11/2009 08:29:24 AM
- 673 Views
Please explain to me how military tribunals compromise my principles?
24/11/2009 02:54:18 AM
- 541 Views
And your little hyperbolic rant would make more sense if it were grounded in reality.
22/11/2009 11:47:17 PM
- 564 Views
Looks like we'll get a Not Guilty plea, and a defense focusing on condeming US foreign policy
23/11/2009 12:36:47 AM
- 794 Views
They'll publicly accuse us of tyranny and brutality in front of a jury and without our censorship.
23/11/2009 08:27:13 AM
- 716 Views
My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America.
24/11/2009 02:57:13 AM
- 609 Views
"My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. "
24/11/2009 06:57:34 AM
- 641 Views
We've had Mohammed in custody for over 6 years...
23/11/2009 07:56:49 AM
- 640 Views
I've already responded to your absurd statements, but let me reiterate a few here
23/11/2009 02:59:09 PM
- 534 Views
And I've responded to yours
24/11/2009 04:57:58 AM
- 608 Views
It's not, at least for me, that we feel the civilian courts are inadequate
24/11/2009 05:28:51 AM
- 601 Views
Good analysis of the situation.
23/11/2009 08:17:01 AM
- 708 Views
It isn't about sending a message. It's about horrible war fighting strategy.
24/11/2009 02:59:31 AM
- 665 Views
No. It's about not using a horribly ineffective strategy just to send a message to terrorists.
24/11/2009 09:29:06 AM
- 578 Views
enemy combatants and terrorists
23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM
- 669 Views

They're not different because from the Third World, but because terrorists.
24/11/2009 08:09:13 AM
- 797 Views