Active Users:561 Time:01/06/2026 05:20:50 PM
No. It's about not using a horribly ineffective strategy just to send a message to terrorists. Joel Send a noteboard - 24/11/2009 09:29:06 AM
Are you actually willing to deliberately damage our own capabilities in hopes of making a good impression on the world? Wow.

And, y'know, satisfy a bloodthirsty visceral lust for revenge under the guise of "justice, " which I've never supported. ;)

How, exactly, is this damaging our capabilities? Does it disarm a single soldier? Arm a single terrorist? Does it hurt the morale of the former to know that when he says he's fighting for justice, it's more than empty words? Does it help the morale of the latter to know that when he accuses America of injustice it IS just empty words?

This doesn't hurt us; we won't lose any intel because, let's face it, Mohammed hasn't just been sitting there twiddling his thumbs for six years: He's been interrogated. Thoroughly. Repeatedly. By multiple people from multiple agencies. The Departments of State and Defense could tell you what his third grade teacher had for breakfast twenty years ago. It won't aid or encourage our enemies, but just the opposite; it won't harm or discourage our soldiers or allies, but, once again, just the opposite. It will show that America is honest, truly stands for freedom and justice. And that people who try to rationalize mass murder by denying all these things are deranged, lying or both. If anything, it amuses me no end the rabid dogs will HELP US DO IT by admitting all their actions then trying to convince people they could ever be justified. This is the best thing to happen to us since Boeing came up with the Predator.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
No need to interrogate Osama bin Laden? - 20/11/2009 12:48:27 AM 1303 Views
oO uhm, what? - 20/11/2009 12:54:13 AM 772 Views
Yeah, a lot of people were fuzzy on that till this started. - 20/11/2009 09:30:39 AM 790 Views
on the other hand, we're more than willing to take them out back with a confession. - 20/11/2009 06:34:12 PM 786 Views
As it seems we will. - 24/11/2009 09:41:18 AM 792 Views
New York is now asking for $75 MILLION for the KSM trial - 20/11/2009 01:43:26 AM 724 Views
Its to salve their conscinse - 20/11/2009 01:55:08 AM 724 Views
That's exactly the problem! - 20/11/2009 01:58:37 AM 729 Views
If this trial were being held in any other country - 20/11/2009 01:56:07 AM 724 Views
It's a terrible precedent no matter how you look at it. - 20/11/2009 02:13:46 AM 751 Views
It IS a terrible precdent, hence you and others are citing it 65 years after WWII ended. - 20/11/2009 09:23:45 AM 647 Views
Spare me the bullshit. - 20/11/2009 01:57:16 PM 644 Views
I will if you will. - 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM 774 Views
No, you won't. You never will. - 20/11/2009 06:14:30 PM 648 Views
You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem. - 23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM 725 Views
No, that's not right. You don't read very closely. - 23/11/2009 02:21:54 PM 662 Views
In this case my reading comprehension is more than adequate. - 24/11/2009 09:16:39 AM 688 Views
You don't think this is a military struggle? Wow. - 20/11/2009 02:52:26 PM 710 Views
Allow me to point out... - 20/11/2009 03:02:33 PM 682 Views
Well, Timothy McVeigh was in OUR Army. - 20/11/2009 03:55:18 PM 801 Views
That's the thing, they aren't a terrorist group - 20/11/2009 04:54:31 PM 739 Views
It would help if you would offer any argument in favour of your stance. - 20/11/2009 08:43:08 PM 674 Views
I only use the word army cause I can't think of a better one - 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM 724 Views
Yes. "Terrorist group". - 21/11/2009 12:02:04 PM 745 Views
Yeah I guess you're right - 22/11/2009 01:34:34 AM 662 Views
Military struggles involve militaries. - 20/11/2009 03:23:14 PM 846 Views
Once again, bullshit. - 20/11/2009 06:09:31 PM 803 Views
Aaaah, I see; it's a question of who's the master, is it? - 23/11/2009 07:47:43 AM 851 Views
You're wasting your time - 23/11/2009 02:24:57 PM 699 Views
This is wrong - 20/11/2009 07:41:35 PM 699 Views
We're a long way from the shore of Tripoli. - 23/11/2009 05:59:19 AM 783 Views
Nevertheless, uniforms or a nation is not a requirement - 23/11/2009 03:09:22 PM 703 Views
Rightly or wrongly, I disagree. - 24/11/2009 08:48:25 AM 765 Views
That is bad - 21/11/2009 12:31:04 AM 686 Views
You're not going far enough, man. - 20/11/2009 11:03:08 AM 734 Views
Blah blah blah blah blah *NM* - 20/11/2009 01:57:39 PM 312 Views
I just can't imagine how they expect to get a fair trial. - 20/11/2009 03:17:28 AM 663 Views
The Code of Conduct - 20/11/2009 07:23:02 PM 789 Views
The mention of God is interesting. *NM* - 21/11/2009 05:24:14 AM 438 Views
Your little diatribe in the beginning only makes me glad... - 22/11/2009 05:32:57 AM 821 Views
I understand your "jihadist narrative" - 22/11/2009 06:36:41 PM 841 Views
Good analysis of the situation. - 23/11/2009 08:17:01 AM 807 Views
It isn't about sending a message. It's about horrible war fighting strategy. - 24/11/2009 02:59:31 AM 793 Views
No. It's about not using a horribly ineffective strategy just to send a message to terrorists. - 24/11/2009 09:29:06 AM 674 Views
enemy combatants and terrorists - 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM 777 Views
They're not different because from the Third World, but because terrorists. - 24/11/2009 08:09:13 AM 904 Views
not every soldier in history has worn a uniform - 24/11/2009 11:00:34 PM 598 Views
One example would be Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys - 25/11/2009 06:23:08 PM 760 Views
Just for fun, let's call them fundamentalist vigilantes. *NM* - 24/11/2009 11:12:09 PM 288 Views
Works for me. - 01/12/2009 09:12:29 AM 721 Views

Reply to Message