Active Users:1144 Time:01/11/2025 10:22:43 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Works for me. Joel Send a noteboard - 01/12/2009 09:12:29 AM
Makes them violent criminals, but not soldiers.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
No need to interrogate Osama bin Laden? beckstcw - 20/11/2009 12:48:27 AM 1212 Views
oO uhm, what? LadyLorraine - 20/11/2009 12:54:13 AM 682 Views
If they're tried INSIDE the US, then yes, they are entitled to due process. Tom - 20/11/2009 01:44:08 AM 588 Views
Yeah, a lot of people were fuzzy on that till this started. The Name With No Man - 20/11/2009 09:30:39 AM 709 Views
on the other hand, we're more than willing to take them out back with a confession. LadyLorraine - 20/11/2009 06:34:12 PM 703 Views
As it seems we will. The Name With No Man - 24/11/2009 09:41:18 AM 683 Views
New York is now asking for $75 MILLION for the KSM trial Tom - 20/11/2009 01:43:26 AM 635 Views
Its to salve their conscinse Ryan - 20/11/2009 01:55:08 AM 645 Views
That's exactly the problem! beckstcw - 20/11/2009 01:58:37 AM 651 Views
If this trial were being held in any other country beckstcw - 20/11/2009 01:56:07 AM 646 Views
It's a terrible precedent no matter how you look at it. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:13:46 AM 673 Views
It IS a terrible precdent, hence you and others are citing it 65 years after WWII ended. Joel - 20/11/2009 09:23:45 AM 566 Views
Spare me the bullshit. Tom - 20/11/2009 01:57:16 PM 564 Views
I will if you will. Joel - 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM 696 Views
No, you won't. You never will. Tom - 20/11/2009 06:14:30 PM 562 Views
You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem. Joel - 23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM 648 Views
No, that's not right. You don't read very closely. Tom - 23/11/2009 02:21:54 PM 572 Views
In this case my reading comprehension is more than adequate. Joel - 24/11/2009 09:16:39 AM 609 Views
You don't think this is a military struggle? Wow. beckstcw - 20/11/2009 02:52:26 PM 632 Views
Allow me to point out... Legolas - 20/11/2009 03:02:33 PM 601 Views
Well, Timothy McVeigh was in OUR Army. The Name With No Man - 20/11/2009 03:55:18 PM 715 Views
That's the thing, they aren't a terrorist group beckstcw - 20/11/2009 04:54:31 PM 638 Views
It would help if you would offer any argument in favour of your stance. Legolas - 20/11/2009 08:43:08 PM 578 Views
I only use the word army cause I can't think of a better one beckstcw - 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM 615 Views
Yes. "Terrorist group". Legolas - 21/11/2009 12:02:04 PM 667 Views
Yeah I guess you're right beckstcw - 22/11/2009 01:34:34 AM 585 Views
Military struggles involve militaries. Joel - 20/11/2009 03:23:14 PM 755 Views
Once again, bullshit. Tom - 20/11/2009 06:09:31 PM 721 Views
Aaaah, I see; it's a question of who's the master, is it? Joel - 23/11/2009 07:47:43 AM 750 Views
You're wasting your time Tom - 23/11/2009 02:24:57 PM 613 Views
This is wrong Isaac - 20/11/2009 07:41:35 PM 610 Views
We're a long way from the shore of Tripoli. Joel - 23/11/2009 05:59:19 AM 688 Views
Nevertheless, uniforms or a nation is not a requirement Isaac - 23/11/2009 03:09:22 PM 624 Views
Rightly or wrongly, I disagree. Joel - 24/11/2009 08:48:25 AM 678 Views
That is bad AgentOrange - 21/11/2009 12:31:04 AM 602 Views
You're not going far enough, man. Joel - 20/11/2009 11:03:08 AM 655 Views
Blah blah blah blah blah *NM* Tom - 20/11/2009 01:57:39 PM 276 Views
I just can't imagine how they expect to get a fair trial. Gher - 20/11/2009 03:17:28 AM 577 Views
The Code of Conduct Isaac - 20/11/2009 07:23:02 PM 705 Views
The mention of God is interesting. *NM* Ghavrel - 21/11/2009 05:24:14 AM 395 Views
Your little diatribe in the beginning only makes me glad... Libby - 22/11/2009 05:32:57 AM 739 Views
I understand your "jihadist narrative" beckstcw - 22/11/2009 06:36:41 PM 744 Views
No you don't Libby - 22/11/2009 11:16:18 PM 661 Views
Oh, so you know better than Army attorneys about Miranda rights? Tom - 22/11/2009 11:52:00 PM 690 Views
I find no mention of Miranda in that article. Joel - 23/11/2009 08:13:05 AM 701 Views
I can explain it to you right now if you want? Libby - 23/11/2009 08:21:48 AM 614 Views
Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court: Tom - 23/11/2009 02:56:19 PM 703 Views
Re: Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court: Libby - 24/11/2009 04:55:12 AM 826 Views
I'm glad that you will never be in a position where a decision you make can affect my life. beckstcw - 23/11/2009 12:27:35 AM 559 Views
Actually people of my thinking are already making decisions that affect your life. Libby - 23/11/2009 08:29:24 AM 690 Views
Please explain to me how military tribunals compromise my principles? beckstcw - 24/11/2009 02:54:18 AM 559 Views
And your little hyperbolic rant would make more sense if it were grounded in reality. Tom - 22/11/2009 11:47:17 PM 583 Views
Looks like we'll get a Not Guilty plea, and a defense focusing on condeming US foreign policy beckstcw - 23/11/2009 12:36:47 AM 810 Views
They'll publicly accuse us of tyranny and brutality in front of a jury and without our censorship. Joel - 23/11/2009 08:27:13 AM 737 Views
My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. beckstcw - 24/11/2009 02:57:13 AM 625 Views
"My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. " Joel - 24/11/2009 06:57:34 AM 660 Views
We've had Mohammed in custody for over 6 years... Libby - 23/11/2009 07:56:49 AM 676 Views
I've already responded to your absurd statements, but let me reiterate a few here Tom - 23/11/2009 02:59:09 PM 553 Views
And I've responded to yours Libby - 24/11/2009 04:57:58 AM 624 Views
It's not, at least for me, that we feel the civilian courts are inadequate beckstcw - 24/11/2009 05:28:51 AM 618 Views
Good analysis of the situation. Joel - 23/11/2009 08:17:01 AM 724 Views
It isn't about sending a message. It's about horrible war fighting strategy. beckstcw - 24/11/2009 02:59:31 AM 708 Views
No. It's about not using a horribly ineffective strategy just to send a message to terrorists. Joel - 24/11/2009 09:29:06 AM 598 Views
enemy combatants and terrorists imlad - 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM 687 Views
They're not different because from the Third World, but because terrorists. Joel - 24/11/2009 08:09:13 AM 823 Views
not every soldier in history has worn a uniform imlad - 24/11/2009 11:00:34 PM 497 Views
One example would be Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys imlad - 25/11/2009 06:23:08 PM 674 Views
Just for fun, let's call them fundamentalist vigilantes. *NM* Vodalus - 24/11/2009 11:12:09 PM 250 Views
Works for me. Joel - 01/12/2009 09:12:29 AM 641 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes