yes, her sexual orientation is a part of this story, but i read this morning that the aclu sued the school district because the girl wanted to put on a tux and bring her girlfriend to the prom. it was the "cross dressing" that the school was calling into question, not her orientation.
Legally speaking schools basically have leeway to enforce any dress code so long as they apply it evenly and can demonstrate they are not deliberately being selective in application. I guess a case could be made that if they had a dress code stipulating suits for males and dresses/skirts for females they'd have a pretty solid case. I did think it weird they'd be challenging only on grounds of two girls going together since showing up to socials stag or with friends of the same gender is a pretty routine thing, as is girls dancing together. Of course the situation still seems intensely stupid to me and their motives are fairly transparent but it does change the legal situation I should imagine. And I can easily see even fairly open-minded people who might have sided with her getting ticked at legal action and just slamming the book shut with a "Fine, we'll just cancel the whole thing anyway, saves us the expense and usual wad of alcohol and date rape issues"
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date
- 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM
1863 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM*
- 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM
299 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM
943 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM
777 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM
779 Views
What???
- 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM
860 Views
Actually...
- 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM
868 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense.
- 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM
784 Views
That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM
846 Views
Er...
- 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM
721 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM
787 Views
...
- 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM
717 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt."
- 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM
729 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that.
- 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM
779 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say?
- 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM
677 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM
736 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong.
- 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM
757 Views
Re: This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 02:31:06 PM
800 Views
Why don't you show me where I said marriage is holy OR made a religious argument, you imbecile?
- 12/03/2010 10:32:42 PM
770 Views
actually, i thought i read that it was because she wanted to wear a tux instead of a dress
- 12/03/2010 02:46:00 AM
798 Views
Kind of a different can of worms then
- 12/03/2010 03:20:35 AM
746 Views
What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 14/03/2010 01:24:47 AM
728 Views
Hmm. Apparently it is legal to discriminate upon the basis of gender. Imagine that.
- 14/03/2010 02:45:51 AM
714 Views
It kind of makes sense, given the highly arbitrary and stereotypical nature of gender.
- 14/03/2010 03:35:44 AM
645 Views
Re: What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 15/03/2010 02:01:00 AM
764 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO
- 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM
805 Views
Maybe.
- 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM
801 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters"
- 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM
720 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here.
- 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM
708 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt...
- 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM
770 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM
748 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM
738 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under
- 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM
625 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under
- 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM
784 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux"
- 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM
669 Views
For the record...
- 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM
727 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM
768 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM
789 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM
758 Views
No no, I know how you feel. I'm just disinclined to have sympathy for the school.
- 12/03/2010 11:28:35 PM
628 Views
Alternatively, I have little sympathy for the school, I just don't have much for her either
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
743 Views
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
743 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit?
- 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM
727 Views
Regardless of "rights" invovled, I don't see why she shouldn't be able to go as she pleases.
- 12/03/2010 05:25:31 PM
775 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend
- 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM
848 Views
Another thing I think people should remember -
- 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM
846 Views
One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM
769 Views
Re: One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM
829 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance
- 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM
661 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much?
- 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM
630 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else
- 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM
696 Views
It does
- 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM
680 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM
626 Views
I typically agree with you
- 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM
732 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM
674 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM
734 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM
614 Views
He wasn't neccessarily advocating it. He was translating what they were doing into something that
- 16/03/2010 01:37:59 AM
695 Views
I'd argue that that kind of hypocrisy is invaluable in today's world, actually.
- 16/03/2010 01:46:16 AM
681 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM
718 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM
633 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM
827 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM*
- 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM
469 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened
- 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM
618 Views
