Active Users:1054 Time:16/09/2026 12:25:52 PM
I have issues with both sides, I think snoopcester Send a noteboard - 12/03/2010 02:44:06 PM
ACKSON, Miss. - An 18-year-old Mississippi lesbian student whose school district canceled her senior prom rather than allow her to escort her girlfriend and wear a tuxedo said she got some unfriendly looks from classmates when she reluctantly returned to campus Thursday.


No problem with the school imposing a dress code on the prom - While I have a degree of sympathy for the girl, there clearly are accepted limits on the dress code which seems reasonable to me - I wouldn't have much time for someone who complained that they didn't get to go dressed as Jonny Rotten, as an example.
Though I suppose a tux isn't as far out as that example by a long way.
Not letting her take her girlfriend is something I don't agree with the school on. Either you are allowed to take a date with you or you aren't - seems deeply unfair to me to say you can only take a date if your choice of date isn't the same gender as you and if they are you have to go alone.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date - 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM 1934 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM 333 Views
Not ALL of the US. There were same-sex couples at my prom. *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:26:24 AM 379 Views
Yeah, don't worry, I know it's not like that everywhere. - 12/03/2010 09:15:43 AM 756 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage. - 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM 1016 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM 843 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM 849 Views
Ummmm.... no. - 12/03/2010 11:02:50 PM 867 Views
i totally agree 100% with what you're saying - 12/03/2010 02:33:55 AM 978 Views
What??? - 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM 940 Views
Actually... - 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM 940 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense. - 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM 856 Views
That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM 912 Views
Er... - 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM 790 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM 864 Views
... - 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM 786 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt." - 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM 802 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that. - 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM 848 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say? - 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM 751 Views
Again, you're right. - 12/03/2010 03:59:13 PM 723 Views
Yup. - 12/03/2010 04:02:26 PM 828 Views
Not really. Her point is that they should both be illegal. - 12/03/2010 07:01:47 PM 755 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM 808 Views
And when the school refused to change it's policy... - 12/03/2010 03:25:03 PM 750 Views
Absurd. - 12/03/2010 08:27:19 PM 826 Views
The rules were unjust. - 13/03/2010 05:09:59 AM 853 Views
Wow, talk about proving my point! - 12/03/2010 11:04:34 PM 967 Views
So hang on. - 13/03/2010 05:04:58 AM 867 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong. - 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM 823 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO - 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM 878 Views
Maybe. - 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM 875 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM 793 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 01:53:39 PM 827 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 03:04:43 PM 783 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here. - 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM 778 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt... - 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM 848 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM 817 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM 810 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under - 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM 697 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under - 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM 851 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux" - 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM 744 Views
Your comments are inconsistent - 15/03/2010 02:09:43 AM 802 Views
I think you're optimistic about what her chances would've been - 12/03/2010 07:13:38 PM 802 Views
For the record... - 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM 816 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM 852 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM 873 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM 830 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit? - 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM 805 Views
Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 01:46:23 PM 801 Views
Re: Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 07:25:41 PM 890 Views
I have issues with both sides, I think - 12/03/2010 02:44:06 PM 770 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend - 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM 940 Views
Another thing I think people should remember - - 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM 921 Views
One point though - 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM 838 Views
Re: One point though - 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM 904 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance - 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM 740 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much? - 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM 700 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else - 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM 768 Views
It does - 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM 748 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM 691 Views
I typically agree with you - 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM 806 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM 748 Views
yah, but at this point, how much of it is the girl? - 13/03/2010 10:24:57 PM 715 Views
Is she a child or an adult? IIRC she's 18 - 13/03/2010 11:33:39 PM 769 Views
No, it should not - 14/03/2010 12:33:56 AM 962 Views
Re: No, it should not - 14/03/2010 01:16:33 AM 874 Views
I understood that. You explained it well. *NM* - 14/03/2010 03:28:10 AM 354 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM 805 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM 688 Views
This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 04:27:43 AM 835 Views
Re: This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 05:18:11 AM 1077 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM 790 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM 705 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM 906 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:11:11 AM 802 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 03:42:06 AM 837 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:47:47 AM 849 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 04:09:18 AM 818 Views
You make good points. *NM* - 15/03/2010 08:08:37 PM 321 Views
Ah, yes, "the rules." - 15/03/2010 01:47:31 AM 739 Views
Read my replies to Nossy and Ghavrel - 15/03/2010 05:01:29 AM 811 Views
Slippery slope arguments are stupid. - 14/03/2010 12:43:00 AM 690 Views
So is likening everythng back to the Civil Rights Movement - 14/03/2010 04:17:54 AM 845 Views
"Dress codes exists for a reason?" - 15/03/2010 01:43:36 AM 749 Views
They do - 15/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 876 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM* - 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM 506 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened - 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM 692 Views
Teenaged lesbians - 15/03/2010 06:55:12 AM 801 Views

Reply to Message