Active Users:904 Time:02/08/2026 11:28:30 AM
I typically agree with you nossy Send a noteboard - 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM


Well, I agree that in of itself it's not a big deal, but a dress code is a dress code, you can alter it, preferably by vote rather than fiat, but it's not what the violation is, it's that someone is violating it. It would seem pretty silly to throw a fit over someone wearing a t-shirt under their suit jacket when the event stipulates ties too, but we are talking about teenagers, just on general principle you want to keep the rules enforced, whatever they are. Forgetting the whole gay thing, for the moment assume someone was demanding the right to attend wearing cowboy boots and hat, you slap them down, this is a school we're talking about after all, kids shouldn't be in the habit of expecting to get their way.

They shouldn't expect to get their way, but they also shouldn't be bypassed if they take the proper steps. If she truly approached it by trying to change the rule in the correct manner (not simply showing up and causing a fuss or whatever), the school should have dealt with it in the right way as well. Canceling the prom because they don't want to say, "No, I'm sorry, those are the rules," is avoidant and wrong to all the other kids as well. It's like... passive-agressive school. I am all for avoiding the disruption of education on some of these bigger issues, but still, it wasn't handled well, imo.
Reply to message
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date - 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM 1919 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM 322 Views
Not ALL of the US. There were same-sex couples at my prom. *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:26:24 AM 367 Views
Yeah, don't worry, I know it's not like that everywhere. - 12/03/2010 09:15:43 AM 739 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage. - 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM 1001 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM 829 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM 834 Views
Ummmm.... no. - 12/03/2010 11:02:50 PM 847 Views
i totally agree 100% with what you're saying - 12/03/2010 02:33:55 AM 963 Views
What??? - 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM 923 Views
Actually... - 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM 926 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense. - 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM 838 Views
That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM 896 Views
Er... - 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM 777 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM 842 Views
... - 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM 768 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt." - 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM 784 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that. - 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM 833 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say? - 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM 732 Views
Again, you're right. - 12/03/2010 03:59:13 PM 702 Views
Yup. - 12/03/2010 04:02:26 PM 806 Views
Not really. Her point is that they should both be illegal. - 12/03/2010 07:01:47 PM 738 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM 790 Views
And when the school refused to change it's policy... - 12/03/2010 03:25:03 PM 728 Views
Absurd. - 12/03/2010 08:27:19 PM 809 Views
The rules were unjust. - 13/03/2010 05:09:59 AM 840 Views
Wow, talk about proving my point! - 12/03/2010 11:04:34 PM 950 Views
So hang on. - 13/03/2010 05:04:58 AM 827 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong. - 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM 804 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO - 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM 860 Views
Maybe. - 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM 861 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM 780 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 01:53:39 PM 807 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 03:04:43 PM 768 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here. - 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM 761 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt... - 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM 828 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM 795 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM 794 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under - 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM 679 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under - 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM 834 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux" - 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM 730 Views
Your comments are inconsistent - 15/03/2010 02:09:43 AM 788 Views
I think you're optimistic about what her chances would've been - 12/03/2010 07:13:38 PM 783 Views
For the record... - 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM 788 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM 835 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM 848 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM 812 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit? - 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM 785 Views
Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 01:46:23 PM 787 Views
Re: Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 07:25:41 PM 871 Views
I have issues with both sides, I think - 12/03/2010 02:44:06 PM 753 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend - 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM 909 Views
Another thing I think people should remember - - 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM 899 Views
One point though - 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM 818 Views
Re: One point though - 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM 887 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance - 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM 721 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much? - 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM 684 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else - 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM 748 Views
It does - 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM 733 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM 674 Views
I typically agree with you - 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM 789 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM 733 Views
yah, but at this point, how much of it is the girl? - 13/03/2010 10:24:57 PM 695 Views
Is she a child or an adult? IIRC she's 18 - 13/03/2010 11:33:39 PM 749 Views
No, it should not - 14/03/2010 12:33:56 AM 947 Views
Re: No, it should not - 14/03/2010 01:16:33 AM 862 Views
I understood that. You explained it well. *NM* - 14/03/2010 03:28:10 AM 341 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM 784 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM 671 Views
This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 04:27:43 AM 821 Views
Re: This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 05:18:11 AM 1063 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM 775 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM 688 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM 890 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:11:11 AM 787 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 03:42:06 AM 819 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:47:47 AM 836 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 04:09:18 AM 799 Views
You make good points. *NM* - 15/03/2010 08:08:37 PM 311 Views
Ah, yes, "the rules." - 15/03/2010 01:47:31 AM 727 Views
Read my replies to Nossy and Ghavrel - 15/03/2010 05:01:29 AM 795 Views
Slippery slope arguments are stupid. - 14/03/2010 12:43:00 AM 675 Views
So is likening everythng back to the Civil Rights Movement - 14/03/2010 04:17:54 AM 832 Views
"Dress codes exists for a reason?" - 15/03/2010 01:43:36 AM 735 Views
They do - 15/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 853 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM* - 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM 494 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened - 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM 673 Views
Teenaged lesbians - 15/03/2010 06:55:12 AM 787 Views

Reply to Message