yes, her sexual orientation is a part of this story, but i read this morning that the aclu sued the school district because the girl wanted to put on a tux and bring her girlfriend to the prom. it was the "cross dressing" that the school was calling into question, not her orientation.
Legally speaking schools basically have leeway to enforce any dress code so long as they apply it evenly and can demonstrate they are not deliberately being selective in application. I guess a case could be made that if they had a dress code stipulating suits for males and dresses/skirts for females they'd have a pretty solid case. I did think it weird they'd be challenging only on grounds of two girls going together since showing up to socials stag or with friends of the same gender is a pretty routine thing, as is girls dancing together. Of course the situation still seems intensely stupid to me and their motives are fairly transparent but it does change the legal situation I should imagine. And I can easily see even fairly open-minded people who might have sided with her getting ticked at legal action and just slamming the book shut with a "Fine, we'll just cancel the whole thing anyway, saves us the expense and usual wad of alcohol and date rape issues"
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date
- 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM
1960 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM*
- 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM
348 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM
1048 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM
873 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM
881 Views
What???
- 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM
974 Views
Actually...
- 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM
969 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense.
- 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM
883 Views
That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM
943 Views
Er...
- 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM
813 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM
896 Views
...
- 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM
821 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt."
- 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM
833 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that.
- 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM
877 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say?
- 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM
777 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM
836 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong.
- 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM
858 Views
Re: This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 02:31:06 PM
896 Views
Why don't you show me where I said marriage is holy OR made a religious argument, you imbecile?
- 12/03/2010 10:32:42 PM
874 Views
actually, i thought i read that it was because she wanted to wear a tux instead of a dress
- 12/03/2010 02:46:00 AM
898 Views
Kind of a different can of worms then
- 12/03/2010 03:20:35 AM
846 Views
What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 14/03/2010 01:24:47 AM
834 Views
Hmm. Apparently it is legal to discriminate upon the basis of gender. Imagine that.
- 14/03/2010 02:45:51 AM
822 Views
It kind of makes sense, given the highly arbitrary and stereotypical nature of gender.
- 14/03/2010 03:35:44 AM
750 Views
Re: What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 15/03/2010 02:01:00 AM
869 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO
- 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM
909 Views
Maybe.
- 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM
900 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters"
- 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM
820 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here.
- 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM
814 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt...
- 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM
874 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM
839 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM
840 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under
- 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM
723 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under
- 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM
884 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux"
- 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM
773 Views
For the record...
- 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM
837 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM
878 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM
898 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM
866 Views
No no, I know how you feel. I'm just disinclined to have sympathy for the school.
- 12/03/2010 11:28:35 PM
728 Views
Alternatively, I have little sympathy for the school, I just don't have much for her either
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
861 Views
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
861 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit?
- 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM
831 Views
Regardless of "rights" invovled, I don't see why she shouldn't be able to go as she pleases.
- 12/03/2010 05:25:31 PM
876 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend
- 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM
962 Views
Another thing I think people should remember -
- 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM
943 Views
One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM
869 Views
Re: One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM
935 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance
- 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM
763 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much?
- 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM
728 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else
- 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM
797 Views
It does
- 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM
777 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM
722 Views
I typically agree with you
- 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM
838 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM
774 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM
829 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM
723 Views
He wasn't neccessarily advocating it. He was translating what they were doing into something that
- 16/03/2010 01:37:59 AM
787 Views
I'd argue that that kind of hypocrisy is invaluable in today's world, actually.
- 16/03/2010 01:46:16 AM
781 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM
820 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM
735 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM
934 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM*
- 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM
520 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened
- 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM
715 Views
