Active Users:505 Time:13/12/2025 10:31:28 PM
I typically agree with you nossy Send a noteboard - 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM


Well, I agree that in of itself it's not a big deal, but a dress code is a dress code, you can alter it, preferably by vote rather than fiat, but it's not what the violation is, it's that someone is violating it. It would seem pretty silly to throw a fit over someone wearing a t-shirt under their suit jacket when the event stipulates ties too, but we are talking about teenagers, just on general principle you want to keep the rules enforced, whatever they are. Forgetting the whole gay thing, for the moment assume someone was demanding the right to attend wearing cowboy boots and hat, you slap them down, this is a school we're talking about after all, kids shouldn't be in the habit of expecting to get their way.

They shouldn't expect to get their way, but they also shouldn't be bypassed if they take the proper steps. If she truly approached it by trying to change the rule in the correct manner (not simply showing up and causing a fuss or whatever), the school should have dealt with it in the right way as well. Canceling the prom because they don't want to say, "No, I'm sorry, those are the rules," is avoidant and wrong to all the other kids as well. It's like... passive-agressive school. I am all for avoiding the disruption of education on some of these bigger issues, but still, it wasn't handled well, imo.
Reply to message
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date - 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM 1802 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM 290 Views
Not ALL of the US. There were same-sex couples at my prom. *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:26:24 AM 324 Views
Yeah, don't worry, I know it's not like that everywhere. - 12/03/2010 09:15:43 AM 680 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage. - 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM 923 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM 755 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM 757 Views
Ummmm.... no. - 12/03/2010 11:02:50 PM 765 Views
i totally agree 100% with what you're saying - 12/03/2010 02:33:55 AM 876 Views
What??? - 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM 827 Views
Actually... - 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM 846 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense. - 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM 766 Views
That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM 822 Views
Er... - 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM 700 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM 768 Views
... - 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM 689 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt." - 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM 703 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that. - 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM 753 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say? - 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM 645 Views
Again, you're right. - 12/03/2010 03:59:13 PM 633 Views
Yup. - 12/03/2010 04:02:26 PM 735 Views
Not really. Her point is that they should both be illegal. - 12/03/2010 07:01:47 PM 662 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM 707 Views
And when the school refused to change it's policy... - 12/03/2010 03:25:03 PM 660 Views
Absurd. - 12/03/2010 08:27:19 PM 731 Views
The rules were unjust. - 13/03/2010 05:09:59 AM 769 Views
Wow, talk about proving my point! - 12/03/2010 11:04:34 PM 868 Views
So hang on. - 13/03/2010 05:04:58 AM 746 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong. - 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM 738 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO - 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM 778 Views
Maybe. - 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM 779 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM 702 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 01:53:39 PM 725 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 03:04:43 PM 687 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here. - 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM 682 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt... - 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM 744 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM 716 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM 711 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under - 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM 605 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under - 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM 759 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux" - 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM 649 Views
Your comments are inconsistent - 15/03/2010 02:09:43 AM 703 Views
I think you're optimistic about what her chances would've been - 12/03/2010 07:13:38 PM 715 Views
For the record... - 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM 694 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM 742 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM 758 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM 731 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit? - 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM 704 Views
Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 01:46:23 PM 704 Views
Re: Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 07:25:41 PM 780 Views
I have issues with both sides, I think - 12/03/2010 02:44:06 PM 668 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend - 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM 826 Views
Another thing I think people should remember - - 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM 824 Views
One point though - 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM 747 Views
Re: One point though - 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM 812 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance - 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM 635 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much? - 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM 610 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else - 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM 672 Views
It does - 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM 655 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM 608 Views
I typically agree with you - 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM 713 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM 650 Views
yah, but at this point, how much of it is the girl? - 13/03/2010 10:24:57 PM 609 Views
Is she a child or an adult? IIRC she's 18 - 13/03/2010 11:33:39 PM 666 Views
No, it should not - 14/03/2010 12:33:56 AM 870 Views
Re: No, it should not - 14/03/2010 01:16:33 AM 785 Views
I understood that. You explained it well. *NM* - 14/03/2010 03:28:10 AM 306 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM 711 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM 588 Views
This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 04:27:43 AM 741 Views
Re: This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 05:18:11 AM 986 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM 685 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM 606 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM 803 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:11:11 AM 705 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 03:42:06 AM 742 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:47:47 AM 758 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 04:09:18 AM 721 Views
You make good points. *NM* - 15/03/2010 08:08:37 PM 278 Views
Ah, yes, "the rules." - 15/03/2010 01:47:31 AM 641 Views
Read my replies to Nossy and Ghavrel - 15/03/2010 05:01:29 AM 715 Views
Slippery slope arguments are stupid. - 14/03/2010 12:43:00 AM 592 Views
So is likening everythng back to the Civil Rights Movement - 14/03/2010 04:17:54 AM 754 Views
"Dress codes exists for a reason?" - 15/03/2010 01:43:36 AM 655 Views
They do - 15/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 771 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM* - 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM 456 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened - 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM 595 Views
Teenaged lesbians - 15/03/2010 06:55:12 AM 706 Views

Reply to Message