When done well, the mud becomes the issue.
The Dems and their media supporters, like the NYT and the Washington Post, are masters of that tactic. look at the Clinton impeachment 20 years ago. Classic quid pro quo sexual harassment and perjury were recast as a Ken Starr witch hunt and unreasonable encroachment into the privacy of the Clinton's marriage. And it worked! So why not keep going back to the well.
Mook
*MySmiley*
"Bustin' makes me feel good!"
Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
*MySmiley*
"Bustin' makes me feel good!"
Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
The truly amusing thing about all this.
13/07/2017 02:32:33 PM
- 1083 Views
that's the thing with muddying the waters
13/07/2017 03:20:24 PM
- 472 Views
The other thing I was thinking....
13/07/2017 07:05:27 PM
- 533 Views
We know how they would react because it happened.
13/07/2017 10:37:43 PM
- 437 Views
So imprison Clinton and Trump both. Just put Kasich in. I don't mind.
14/07/2017 03:40:02 AM
- 451 Views
This is your defense? "Other people would do it too?"
*NM*
14/07/2017 03:36:26 AM
- 218 Views

To quoque or not to quoque, I think the essential defense is there is NO wrongdoing in such events
14/07/2017 04:45:41 AM
- 496 Views
I don't need a defense....
14/07/2017 08:31:12 PM
- 392 Views
Actually it is illegal in several ways
15/07/2017 01:55:02 AM
- 529 Views
dirt on an opponent is equivilent to a monetary disbursment? *NM*
15/07/2017 03:43:28 AM
- 332 Views
Yes
15/07/2017 02:34:53 PM
- 421 Views
Bah
15/07/2017 04:56:08 PM
- 411 Views
Question Mookie, when did you think this law was enacted and last revised?
16/07/2017 11:46:43 AM
- 458 Views
No clue. I could google, of course, but that would be cheating. *NM*
16/07/2017 03:29:52 PM
- 266 Views
The offered dirty was that the Clintons were taking campaign donations from a foreign national again
18/07/2017 08:08:23 PM
- 427 Views
Well yeah. That happened. But it's not the main point. It's a side-bonus.
13/07/2017 10:22:32 PM
- 373 Views
I'm waiting for Little Marco to send me a subpoena.
13/07/2017 10:40:25 PM
- 462 Views
I think I served you a subpoena once. . . It was a small subpoena. *NM*
14/07/2017 09:02:48 AM
- 283 Views
What are your opinions on Manning and Snowden? I honestly don't remember.
14/07/2017 03:42:09 AM
- 422 Views
Well, the Russian government did not swear oaths as members of the US military or public servants
14/07/2017 04:58:18 AM
- 506 Views
Extend the query to Wikileaks publishing the documents, then.
14/07/2017 10:34:53 AM
- 491 Views
Are you sure?
14/07/2017 02:29:51 PM
- 350 Views
That only works if you can claim with a straight face the GOP wouldn't care
14/07/2017 03:32:43 PM
- 487 Views
You've misunderstood me
14/07/2017 06:22:21 PM
- 493 Views
I don't think I have.
15/07/2017 02:34:27 AM
- 425 Views
No I'm not.
15/07/2017 03:09:04 AM
- 498 Views
Re: No I'm not.
15/07/2017 05:07:42 AM
- 449 Views
Re: No I'm not.
17/07/2017 02:55:54 PM
- 496 Views
The Democrats definitely won in regards to changing the conversation.
14/07/2017 06:06:58 PM
- 502 Views
Pay no attention to that CIA agent behind the voting curtain (in X country)
18/07/2017 06:43:38 AM
- 443 Views
When the media is the cornerstone of your political base it is easy to control the tone
19/07/2017 01:22:51 PM
- 492 Views
The other amusing thing is the GOP voters' sudden love for Russia.
14/07/2017 06:43:12 PM
- 515 Views
There's nothing "sudden" about it for me. *NM*
14/07/2017 08:49:38 PM
- 276 Views
I know. I was going to add a comment about how you must love that.
14/07/2017 11:08:41 PM
- 1085 Views

You are the fly in every republican cake
15/07/2017 01:56:24 AM
- 499 Views

It was and still just the isolationist wing of the party that feels that way
19/07/2017 01:27:41 PM
- 455 Views