Active Users:774 Time:21/06/2026 07:36:07 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Extend the query to Wikileaks publishing the documents, then. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 14/07/2017 10:34:53 AM

View original post
Meanwhile, in typical Democrat hypocrisy, they have absolutely no qualms about having used similarly illicit information during the Nixon administration, and consider Daniel Ellsberg and Mark Felt heroes of a sort.

"Everyone's a hypocrite" isn't a great defense.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
The truly amusing thing about all this. LiterateDog - 13/07/2017 02:32:33 PM 1151 Views
that's the thing with muddying the waters damookster - 13/07/2017 03:20:24 PM 557 Views
The media lost the respect they commanded back then. Tom - 13/07/2017 10:42:27 PM 461 Views
The other thing I was thinking.... Jeordam - 13/07/2017 07:05:27 PM 635 Views
We know how they would react because it happened. Tom - 13/07/2017 10:37:43 PM 521 Views
So imprison Clinton and Trump both. Just put Kasich in. I don't mind. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:40:02 AM 550 Views
No thanks. We don't need Mr. Magoo as President. Tom - 14/07/2017 08:46:14 PM 574 Views
And why would we imprison Trump, counselor? Tom - 14/07/2017 08:47:34 PM 523 Views
This is your defense? "Other people would do it too?" *NM* Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:36:26 AM 260 Views
To quoque or not to quoque, I think the essential defense is there is NO wrongdoing in such events Cannoli - 14/07/2017 04:45:41 AM 594 Views
That's at least more logically consistent. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 10:42:08 AM 635 Views
I don't need a defense.... Jeordam - 14/07/2017 08:31:12 PM 473 Views
Actually it is illegal in several ways Roland00 - 15/07/2017 01:55:02 AM 611 Views
dirt on an opponent is equivilent to a monetary disbursment? *NM* damookster - 15/07/2017 03:43:28 AM 375 Views
I don't have an opinion on whether the law was broken here. Ghavrel - 15/07/2017 05:12:08 AM 649 Views
Yes Roland00 - 15/07/2017 02:34:53 PM 532 Views
Bah damookster - 15/07/2017 04:56:08 PM 491 Views
Question Mookie, when did you think this law was enacted and last revised? Roland00 - 16/07/2017 11:46:43 AM 540 Views
No clue. I could google, of course, but that would be cheating. *NM* damookster - 16/07/2017 03:29:52 PM 300 Views
The offered dirty was that the Clintons were taking campaign donations from a foreign national again random thoughts - 18/07/2017 08:08:23 PM 516 Views
I very well could be wrong, but I don't think that I am. Jeordam - 17/07/2017 04:50:24 PM 537 Views
Well yeah. That happened. But it's not the main point. It's a side-bonus. nossy - 13/07/2017 10:22:32 PM 450 Views
I'm waiting for Little Marco to send me a subpoena. Tom - 13/07/2017 10:40:25 PM 555 Views
That's a very good point that needs further exploration damookster - 13/07/2017 11:54:56 PM 549 Views
The New York Times still has a fold? Tom - 14/07/2017 02:28:48 PM 505 Views
I think I served you a subpoena once. . . It was a small subpoena. *NM* Roland00 - 14/07/2017 09:02:48 AM 322 Views
What are your opinions on Manning and Snowden? I honestly don't remember. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:42:09 AM 505 Views
Well, the Russian government did not swear oaths as members of the US military or public servants Cannoli - 14/07/2017 04:58:18 AM 596 Views
Extend the query to Wikileaks publishing the documents, then. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 10:34:53 AM 578 Views
Are you sure? aerocontrols - 14/07/2017 02:29:51 PM 432 Views
That only works if you can claim with a straight face the GOP wouldn't care Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:32:43 PM 581 Views
You've misunderstood me aerocontrols - 14/07/2017 06:22:21 PM 576 Views
I don't think I have. Ghavrel - 15/07/2017 02:34:27 AM 518 Views
No I'm not. aerocontrols - 15/07/2017 03:09:04 AM 595 Views
Re: No I'm not. Ghavrel - 15/07/2017 05:07:42 AM 534 Views
Re: No I'm not. aerocontrols - 17/07/2017 02:55:54 PM 599 Views
Re: No I'm not. Ghavrel - 18/07/2017 01:27:06 AM 489 Views
Yes you are. Tom - 18/07/2017 06:40:45 AM 464 Views
You made the right choice, then. *NM* Ghavrel - 18/07/2017 03:37:40 PM 305 Views
It's really the only way I can get into cool threads aerocontrols - 18/07/2017 04:03:05 PM 461 Views
The Democrats definitely won in regards to changing the conversation. The Shrike - 14/07/2017 06:06:58 PM 586 Views
Pay no attention to that CIA agent behind the voting curtain (in X country) Tom - 18/07/2017 06:43:38 AM 573 Views
When the media is the cornerstone of your political base it is easy to control the tone random thoughts - 19/07/2017 01:22:51 PM 581 Views
The other amusing thing is the GOP voters' sudden love for Russia. Legolas - 14/07/2017 06:43:12 PM 602 Views
There was a great article in the NYT about that The Shrike - 14/07/2017 08:29:29 PM 668 Views
There's nothing "sudden" about it for me. *NM* Tom - 14/07/2017 08:49:38 PM 325 Views
I know. I was going to add a comment about how you must love that. Legolas - 14/07/2017 11:08:41 PM 1173 Views
I'm considering pitching to go on Fox or something. Tom - 18/07/2017 05:41:56 AM 513 Views
Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia aerocontrols - 18/07/2017 04:10:01 PM 714 Views
Good idea. Legolas - 23/07/2017 05:50:33 PM 561 Views
You are the fly in every republican cake Roland00 - 15/07/2017 01:56:24 AM 581 Views
I really don't understand 99% of your responses Tom - 18/07/2017 06:42:09 AM 600 Views
Yes Tom, Yes Exactly *NM* Roland00 - 18/07/2017 03:46:22 PM 295 Views
It was and still just the isolationist wing of the party that feels that way random thoughts - 19/07/2017 01:27:41 PM 535 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes