When done well, the mud becomes the issue.
The Dems and their media supporters, like the NYT and the Washington Post, are masters of that tactic. look at the Clinton impeachment 20 years ago. Classic quid pro quo sexual harassment and perjury were recast as a Ken Starr witch hunt and unreasonable encroachment into the privacy of the Clinton's marriage. And it worked! So why not keep going back to the well.
Mook
*MySmiley*
"Bustin' makes me feel good!"
Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
*MySmiley*
"Bustin' makes me feel good!"
Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
The truly amusing thing about all this.
- 13/07/2017 02:32:33 PM
1203 Views
that's the thing with muddying the waters
- 13/07/2017 03:20:24 PM
589 Views
The other thing I was thinking....
- 13/07/2017 07:05:27 PM
664 Views
We know how they would react because it happened.
- 13/07/2017 10:37:43 PM
553 Views
So imprison Clinton and Trump both. Just put Kasich in. I don't mind.
- 14/07/2017 03:40:02 AM
579 Views
This is your defense? "Other people would do it too?"
*NM*
- 14/07/2017 03:36:26 AM
276 Views
*NM*
- 14/07/2017 03:36:26 AM
276 Views
To quoque or not to quoque, I think the essential defense is there is NO wrongdoing in such events
- 14/07/2017 04:45:41 AM
627 Views
I don't need a defense....
- 14/07/2017 08:31:12 PM
508 Views
Actually it is illegal in several ways
- 15/07/2017 01:55:02 AM
642 Views
dirt on an opponent is equivilent to a monetary disbursment? *NM*
- 15/07/2017 03:43:28 AM
393 Views
Yes
- 15/07/2017 02:34:53 PM
563 Views
Bah
- 15/07/2017 04:56:08 PM
515 Views
Question Mookie, when did you think this law was enacted and last revised?
- 16/07/2017 11:46:43 AM
564 Views
No clue. I could google, of course, but that would be cheating. *NM*
- 16/07/2017 03:29:52 PM
319 Views
The offered dirty was that the Clintons were taking campaign donations from a foreign national again
- 18/07/2017 08:08:23 PM
548 Views
Well yeah. That happened. But it's not the main point. It's a side-bonus.
- 13/07/2017 10:22:32 PM
479 Views
I'm waiting for Little Marco to send me a subpoena.
- 13/07/2017 10:40:25 PM
587 Views
I think I served you a subpoena once. . . It was a small subpoena. *NM*
- 14/07/2017 09:02:48 AM
341 Views
What are your opinions on Manning and Snowden? I honestly don't remember.
- 14/07/2017 03:42:09 AM
531 Views
Well, the Russian government did not swear oaths as members of the US military or public servants
- 14/07/2017 04:58:18 AM
632 Views
Extend the query to Wikileaks publishing the documents, then.
- 14/07/2017 10:34:53 AM
603 Views
Are you sure?
- 14/07/2017 02:29:51 PM
459 Views
That only works if you can claim with a straight face the GOP wouldn't care
- 14/07/2017 03:32:43 PM
606 Views
You've misunderstood me
- 14/07/2017 06:22:21 PM
605 Views
I don't think I have.
- 15/07/2017 02:34:27 AM
545 Views
No I'm not.
- 15/07/2017 03:09:04 AM
622 Views
Re: No I'm not.
- 15/07/2017 05:07:42 AM
560 Views
Re: No I'm not.
- 17/07/2017 02:55:54 PM
635 Views
The Democrats definitely won in regards to changing the conversation.
- 14/07/2017 06:06:58 PM
617 Views
Pay no attention to that CIA agent behind the voting curtain (in X country)
- 18/07/2017 06:43:38 AM
599 Views
When the media is the cornerstone of your political base it is easy to control the tone
- 19/07/2017 01:22:51 PM
609 Views
The other amusing thing is the GOP voters' sudden love for Russia.
- 14/07/2017 06:43:12 PM
636 Views
There's nothing "sudden" about it for me. *NM*
- 14/07/2017 08:49:38 PM
344 Views
I know. I was going to add a comment about how you must love that.
- 14/07/2017 11:08:41 PM
1197 Views
- 14/07/2017 11:08:41 PM
1197 Views
You are the fly in every republican cake
- 15/07/2017 01:56:24 AM
608 Views
- 15/07/2017 01:56:24 AM
608 Views
It was and still just the isolationist wing of the party that feels that way
- 19/07/2017 01:27:41 PM
563 Views

*NM*