Active Users:603 Time:29/12/2025 04:54:49 PM
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1927 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1253 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 609 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1182 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 599 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1007 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 648 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 657 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 733 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 660 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 666 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 629 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 673 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1033 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 598 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 608 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1151 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 620 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1047 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1357 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 615 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 588 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 591 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 637 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1066 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 661 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 990 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 597 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 611 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 599 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 573 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1109 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1037 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1025 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 645 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1123 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1559 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1096 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1279 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1194 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1099 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1026 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1219 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1453 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1087 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1244 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 970 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1064 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 969 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1190 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1295 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1082 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1158 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 971 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1045 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 581 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1031 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 954 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1159 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1251 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1008 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1312 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1134 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1046 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 614 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 579 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 582 Views

Reply to Message