Active Users:314 Time:13/07/2025 09:35:51 AM
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1773 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1115 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 533 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1046 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 535 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 896 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 532 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 585 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 649 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 583 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 592 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 533 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 581 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 908 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 528 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 538 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1028 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 546 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 927 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1213 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 514 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 519 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 527 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 570 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 925 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 576 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 863 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 531 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 531 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 526 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 502 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 957 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 915 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 905 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 559 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 986 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1448 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 956 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1101 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1039 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 953 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 925 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1089 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1325 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 923 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1102 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 845 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 917 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 819 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1039 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1155 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 949 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1044 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 839 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 925 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 501 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 891 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 849 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1022 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1108 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 902 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1169 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 973 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 909 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 549 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 507 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 515 Views

Reply to Message