Active Users:1759 Time:26/09/2026 01:24:17 AM
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2137 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1477 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 722 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1387 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 729 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1203 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 747 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 766 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 871 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 782 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 771 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 742 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 789 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1256 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 719 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 710 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1360 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 745 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1232 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1585 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 724 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 695 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 706 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 747 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1269 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 766 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1174 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 698 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 723 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 714 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 671 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1339 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1243 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1230 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 768 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1312 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1770 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1316 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1481 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1427 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1316 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1231 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1436 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1646 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1299 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1467 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1147 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1265 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1198 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1415 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1496 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1288 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1399 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1185 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1226 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 677 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1256 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1162 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1390 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1509 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1186 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1544 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1362 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1240 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 713 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 701 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 682 Views

Reply to Message