Active Users:788 Time:30/03/2026 02:35:58 AM
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1996 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1311 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 639 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1258 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 625 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1063 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 682 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 685 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 766 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 682 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 689 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 668 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 704 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1089 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 627 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 634 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1213 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 648 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1098 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1415 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 644 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 613 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 616 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 664 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1131 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 683 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1048 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 618 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 634 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 627 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 599 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1167 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1092 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1085 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 671 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1187 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1617 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1165 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1344 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1285 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1168 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1093 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1281 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1508 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1143 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1328 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1020 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1129 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1052 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1253 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1350 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1151 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1212 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1032 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1106 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 606 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1100 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1023 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1233 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1317 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1061 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1378 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1209 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1100 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 641 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 610 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 616 Views

Reply to Message