Active Users:657 Time:10/11/2026 12:38:34 AM
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2167 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1524 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 750 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1424 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 753 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1233 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 765 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 789 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 914 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 812 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 795 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 774 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 811 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1298 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 737 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 739 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1401 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 770 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1269 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1636 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 742 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 726 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 726 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 767 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1292 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 802 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1218 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 715 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 760 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 737 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 691 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1395 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1292 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1270 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 797 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1351 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1814 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1354 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1513 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1467 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1355 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1261 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1479 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1682 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1339 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1505 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1177 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1304 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1241 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1455 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1555 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1323 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1445 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1241 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1266 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 695 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1306 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1200 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1448 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1542 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1221 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1594 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1411 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1291 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 735 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 733 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 703 Views

Reply to Message