Active Users:834 Time:10/08/2026 04:46:25 PM
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2092 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1430 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 697 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1350 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 711 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1162 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 724 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 744 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 837 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 751 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 746 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 720 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 761 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1208 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 688 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 684 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1316 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 721 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1186 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1541 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 698 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 668 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 674 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 729 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1227 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 742 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1137 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 669 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 696 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 689 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 652 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1281 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1198 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1186 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 730 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1271 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1724 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1255 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1439 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1384 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1270 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1198 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1385 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1604 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1255 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1425 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1106 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1222 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1160 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1359 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1452 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1246 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1329 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1136 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1191 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 656 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1209 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1127 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1338 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1447 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1148 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1483 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1319 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1192 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 693 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 676 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 664 Views

Reply to Message