Active Users:1513 Time:30/10/2025 04:13:14 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1881 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 590 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1199 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 581 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1129 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 578 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 969 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 594 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 629 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 708 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 655 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 636 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 642 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 595 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 638 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 1093 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 617 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 982 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 572 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 578 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1105 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 590 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1004 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1301 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 572 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 561 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 588 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 566 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 615 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1006 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 634 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 945 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 573 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 581 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 570 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 570 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 541 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1043 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 987 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 974 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 1037 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 1070 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 611 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1059 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1519 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1041 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1226 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1130 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1049 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 990 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1173 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1409 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1016 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1193 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 926 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1011 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 910 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1133 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1243 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1023 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1113 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 919 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 997 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 548 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 978 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 916 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1110 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1197 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 967 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1268 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1084 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 992 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 593 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 554 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 563 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes