Active Users:888 Time:09/02/2026 01:36:20 AM
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1962 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1289 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 626 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1221 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 613 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1038 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 669 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 672 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 747 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 668 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 674 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 648 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 688 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1064 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 611 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 624 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1187 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 634 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1076 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1385 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 626 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 600 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 602 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 651 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1100 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 673 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1026 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 606 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 624 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 610 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 589 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1143 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1064 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1055 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 657 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1160 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1595 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1134 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1317 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1239 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1132 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1059 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1252 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1479 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1116 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1288 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 997 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1098 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1021 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1220 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1324 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1119 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1189 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1006 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1078 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 595 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1066 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 990 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1202 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1292 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1038 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1346 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1168 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1075 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 626 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 594 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 599 Views

Reply to Message