Active Users:640 Time:10/11/2026 12:39:08 AM
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man Send a noteboard - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
The book does not go on sale until the 27th. I'm sure that ppl (if there actually are any, not sure of this) have been provided with advance copies they've also agreed to some sort of NDA. I dislike the thought of RAFO promoting the breaking of a NDA.
Besides, I think it will promote all kinds of faux nonesense. "Rand is a transvestite!" "Egwene kills Gawyn in a fit of rage!" etc etc. I don't think we need that either.



The posts are to be spoiler free only. Which means says things like 'Oh man it was awesome when Moiraine came back and balefired Cadsuane' are off limits. If anyone posts things that are clearly spoilers then the admins will delete it. I don't see anything wrong with post like 'the Rand chapters are really dark and depressing' or 'Egwene shows herself to be a strong chargacter and is far more likable than in most of the series'.

I do agree with you to a degree in that I don't think we'll get a wholelot more from the reviews than we've already got from Jason's and there's no really way to prove that the people writing the reviews actually have read an advanced copy, still it should be there for those who are interested I think.
While the wicked stand confounded call me, with thy saint surrounded
This message last edited by Crackbrained Asha'man on 21/09/2009 at 08:27:09 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2168 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1525 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 750 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1425 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 753 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1234 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 765 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 789 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 914 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 812 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 795 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 774 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 811 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1299 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 737 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 739 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1402 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 770 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1270 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1637 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 742 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 726 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 726 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 767 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1293 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 802 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1219 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 715 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 760 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 737 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 691 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1396 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1293 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1271 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 797 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1351 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1816 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1355 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1514 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1468 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1356 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1262 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1480 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1683 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1339 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1506 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1178 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1305 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1242 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1456 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1556 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1324 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1446 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1241 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1267 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 695 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1307 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1201 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1448 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1543 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1221 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1595 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1411 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1291 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 735 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 733 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 703 Views

Reply to Message