Active Users:815 Time:08/02/2026 11:53:48 PM
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man Send a noteboard - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
The book does not go on sale until the 27th. I'm sure that ppl (if there actually are any, not sure of this) have been provided with advance copies they've also agreed to some sort of NDA. I dislike the thought of RAFO promoting the breaking of a NDA.
Besides, I think it will promote all kinds of faux nonesense. "Rand is a transvestite!" "Egwene kills Gawyn in a fit of rage!" etc etc. I don't think we need that either.



The posts are to be spoiler free only. Which means says things like 'Oh man it was awesome when Moiraine came back and balefired Cadsuane' are off limits. If anyone posts things that are clearly spoilers then the admins will delete it. I don't see anything wrong with post like 'the Rand chapters are really dark and depressing' or 'Egwene shows herself to be a strong chargacter and is far more likable than in most of the series'.

I do agree with you to a degree in that I don't think we'll get a wholelot more from the reviews than we've already got from Jason's and there's no really way to prove that the people writing the reviews actually have read an advanced copy, still it should be there for those who are interested I think.
While the wicked stand confounded call me, with thy saint surrounded
This message last edited by Crackbrained Asha'man on 21/09/2009 at 08:27:09 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1962 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1287 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 626 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1219 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 613 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1038 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 669 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 672 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 747 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 668 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 674 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 648 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 688 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1064 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 611 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 624 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1186 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 634 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1075 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1382 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 626 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 600 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 602 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 650 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1098 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 672 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1024 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 606 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 623 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 610 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 588 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1141 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1061 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1054 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 657 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1158 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1594 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1132 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1315 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1237 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1131 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1059 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1252 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1477 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1114 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1287 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 994 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1098 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1019 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1219 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1322 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1117 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1187 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1004 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1076 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 595 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1064 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 988 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1200 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1290 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1038 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1344 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1166 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1075 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 626 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 594 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 599 Views

Reply to Message