Active Users:2544 Time:19/06/2026 01:30:28 PM
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM
Are you willing to be the one who makes sure the poster actually has a pre-release copy? Or are you just willing to make more work for someone else? If you are actually willing to do the actual work, how pray tell will you do that? What kind of proof can the reviewers provide? Scanned copyright page? anybody can fake those. ISBN #? already published. Get real man.


I don't think any proof should be necessary at all (see my comment about how wotmania was filled with spoiler-free reviews for at least the last three books with no negative effects to speak of). No system for prooving something like this would be foolproof in today's day and age, of course.

Umm...You ever heard of Napster? All it would take would be one quote from the book and TOR would be completely within it's rights to shut RAFO down. Are YOU personally willing to be legally responsible for something that someone posts here? Sorry but I'm not. And sure, anybody at any time can post anything here. But by providing a spot for pirates to post what they want, the situation changes to "abetting and encouraging".


I'm missing the Napster connection here. RAFO has stipulated that reviews be spoiler/content-free, so noone would be allowed to post quotes from the book. One's impressions about a book, CD, movie, or any other copyrighted work are not copyrightable as far as I know. On a side note, do you really think every RAFO member would be personally liable to Tor if one member posted one quote from the book?

If the admins have a serious concern about legal liability, I say don't allow the reviews. If the only serious concern is one of authenticity/credibility, though, I don't see the problem. RAFO isn't vauching for the reviews in any way, and no WoT sites that I know of have been made laughing stocks in the past over silly or just plain inaccurate reviews.
This message last edited by RandAllThor on 22/09/2009 at 12:23:36 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2041 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1374 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 670 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1316 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 672 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1116 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 704 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 712 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 797 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 718 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 719 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 695 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 731 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1149 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 656 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 659 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1261 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 693 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1146 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1475 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 668 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 641 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 647 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 696 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1176 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 711 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1103 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 641 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 664 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 657 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 624 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1227 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1155 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1144 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 697 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1233 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1679 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1214 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1393 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1336 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1227 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1152 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1338 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1568 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1205 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1376 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1068 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1180 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1113 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1308 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1404 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1198 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1272 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1090 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1161 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 634 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1154 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1084 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1281 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1387 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1112 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1433 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1255 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1154 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 669 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 641 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 638 Views

Reply to Message