Active Users:944 Time:25/09/2026 06:23:33 AM
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM
I don't think any proof should be necessary at all (see my comment about how wotmania was filled with spoiler-free reviews for at least the last three books with no negative effects to speak of). No system for prooving something like this would be foolproof in today's day and age, of course.

Yet this is what you said.
"Surely the idea of making reviewers provide proof that they do actually have the book would put this issue to rest once and for all while also ensuring that the site only offers genuine reviews?"
So I ask you again, are YOU personally willing to be the one to make sure the reviewers provide proof? Or are you just willing to give others more work?


I'm missing the Napster connection here. RAFO has stipulated that reviews be spoiler/content-free, so noone would be allowed to post quotes from the book. One's impressions about a book, CD, movie, or any other copyrighted work are not copyrightable as far as I know. On a side note, do you really think every RAFO member would be personally liable to Tor if one member posted one quote from the book?

Again are you willing to police the reviews to be sure they are spoiler free? Sid said he wouldn't, and I don't blame him. And I never said that RAFO members would be leagally responsible, and if I inadvertantly gave that impression I apologize; but RAFO as an website may be subject to shutdown.

NaCl(but obviously it's going to happen anyway, just wanted to be on record as being against it)H2O

This message last edited by NaClH2O on 22/09/2009 at 12:44:36 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2131 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1473 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 721 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1385 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 728 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1200 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 746 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 765 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 869 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 780 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 770 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 741 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 788 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1251 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 717 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 709 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1356 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 743 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1226 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1582 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 723 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 694 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 705 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 746 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1265 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 765 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1169 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 697 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 722 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 712 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 670 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1334 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1241 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1224 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 767 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1307 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1768 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1313 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1479 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1424 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1314 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1228 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1432 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1640 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1292 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1462 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1142 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1260 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1194 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1411 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1493 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1283 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1392 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1179 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1221 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 676 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1250 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1158 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1385 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1504 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1182 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1538 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1357 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1238 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 712 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 700 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 681 Views

Reply to Message