Active Users:362 Time:27/03/2026 07:58:23 AM
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM
I don't think any proof should be necessary at all (see my comment about how wotmania was filled with spoiler-free reviews for at least the last three books with no negative effects to speak of). No system for prooving something like this would be foolproof in today's day and age, of course.

Yet this is what you said.
"Surely the idea of making reviewers provide proof that they do actually have the book would put this issue to rest once and for all while also ensuring that the site only offers genuine reviews?"
So I ask you again, are YOU personally willing to be the one to make sure the reviewers provide proof? Or are you just willing to give others more work?


I'm missing the Napster connection here. RAFO has stipulated that reviews be spoiler/content-free, so noone would be allowed to post quotes from the book. One's impressions about a book, CD, movie, or any other copyrighted work are not copyrightable as far as I know. On a side note, do you really think every RAFO member would be personally liable to Tor if one member posted one quote from the book?

Again are you willing to police the reviews to be sure they are spoiler free? Sid said he wouldn't, and I don't blame him. And I never said that RAFO members would be leagally responsible, and if I inadvertantly gave that impression I apologize; but RAFO as an website may be subject to shutdown.

NaCl(but obviously it's going to happen anyway, just wanted to be on record as being against it)H2O

This message last edited by NaClH2O on 22/09/2009 at 12:44:36 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1995 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1311 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 638 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1256 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 625 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1062 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 682 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 685 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 765 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 681 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 689 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 667 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 703 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1087 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 627 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 633 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1211 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 648 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1097 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1414 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 643 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 613 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 614 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 664 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1129 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 683 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1047 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 618 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 634 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 627 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 598 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1165 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1091 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1083 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 671 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1186 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1617 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1165 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1344 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1284 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1167 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1093 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1280 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1505 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1143 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1324 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1019 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1128 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1048 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1253 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1349 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1149 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1212 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1030 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1104 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 605 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1098 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1021 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1231 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1316 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1060 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1376 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1207 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1099 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 641 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 609 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 616 Views

Reply to Message