Active Users:657 Time:10/11/2026 12:38:19 AM
Re: Good to know. DomA Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM
I hadn't heard that Harriet and Brandon didn't want anything out there. Of course I wouldn't have voted for something that was against their wishes if I had. So yeah, I take back my yes vote now that I know this. And I kind of feel like a jerk.


I don't know either, but it's the vibe I get from the little I know, notably the decision not to have ARC printed.

Don't feel like a jerk, you can't be blamed for wanting reviews
Personally I don't mind them - I just won't read them except from one or two reviewers I know and trust, if they happen to publish some down the line. I don't want to go into TGS with false expectations because I don't know where this or that person stands about the series, that's all. Jason I knew, having read his previous reviews and knowing on what we agree and disagree - and I know he'd be very respectful about spoilers, so I read him. There are few others like this - Bob Klutz, Leigh Butler, Matt from TL - and that's about it. There's gonna be plenty of time to read what other readers think of TGS after I've read TGS.

Unauthorized and fake reviews I'm against on principle, though. The less of those around the better, as far as I'm concerned. It might stay in a single thread here, but that won't stop people from repeating the information elsewhere, whether it's true or false.


Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2167 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1524 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 750 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1424 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 753 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1233 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 765 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 789 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 914 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 812 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 795 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 774 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 811 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1298 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 737 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 739 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1400 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 770 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1269 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1635 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 742 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 726 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 726 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 767 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1292 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 802 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1217 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 715 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 760 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 737 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 691 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1394 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1291 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1270 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 797 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1351 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1814 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1354 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1513 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1467 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1355 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1261 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1479 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1682 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1339 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1505 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1177 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1303 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1240 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1455 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1554 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1323 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1445 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1241 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1266 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 695 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1306 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1200 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1448 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1541 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1221 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1594 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1411 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1290 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 735 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 733 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 703 Views

Reply to Message