Active Users:829 Time:10/08/2026 04:42:07 PM
Re: Good to know. DomA Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM
I hadn't heard that Harriet and Brandon didn't want anything out there. Of course I wouldn't have voted for something that was against their wishes if I had. So yeah, I take back my yes vote now that I know this. And I kind of feel like a jerk.


I don't know either, but it's the vibe I get from the little I know, notably the decision not to have ARC printed.

Don't feel like a jerk, you can't be blamed for wanting reviews
Personally I don't mind them - I just won't read them except from one or two reviewers I know and trust, if they happen to publish some down the line. I don't want to go into TGS with false expectations because I don't know where this or that person stands about the series, that's all. Jason I knew, having read his previous reviews and knowing on what we agree and disagree - and I know he'd be very respectful about spoilers, so I read him. There are few others like this - Bob Klutz, Leigh Butler, Matt from TL - and that's about it. There's gonna be plenty of time to read what other readers think of TGS after I've read TGS.

Unauthorized and fake reviews I'm against on principle, though. The less of those around the better, as far as I'm concerned. It might stay in a single thread here, but that won't stop people from repeating the information elsewhere, whether it's true or false.


Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2092 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1430 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 697 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1350 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 711 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1161 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 724 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 744 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 837 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 751 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 746 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 720 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 761 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1207 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 688 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 684 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1315 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 721 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1186 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1541 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 698 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 668 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 674 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 729 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1225 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 742 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1137 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 669 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 696 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 689 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 652 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1281 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1198 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1186 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 730 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1271 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1723 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1255 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1438 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1384 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1270 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1196 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1383 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1603 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1255 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1425 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1105 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1221 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1160 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1358 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1452 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1246 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1328 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1136 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1189 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 656 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1209 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1127 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1338 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1446 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1148 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1482 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1319 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1192 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 693 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 676 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 664 Views

Reply to Message