I hadn't heard that Harriet and Brandon didn't want anything out there. Of course I wouldn't have voted for something that was against their wishes if I had. So yeah, I take back my yes vote now that I know this. And I kind of feel like a jerk. 

I don't know either, but it's the vibe I get from the little I know, notably the decision not to have ARC printed.
Don't feel like a jerk, you can't be blamed for wanting reviews

Personally I don't mind them - I just won't read them except from one or two reviewers I know and trust, if they happen to publish some down the line. I don't want to go into TGS with false expectations because I don't know where this or that person stands about the series, that's all. Jason I knew, having read his previous reviews and knowing on what we agree and disagree - and I know he'd be very respectful about spoilers, so I read him. There are few others like this - Bob Klutz, Leigh Butler, Matt from TL - and that's about it. There's gonna be plenty of time to read what other readers think of TGS after I've read TGS.
Unauthorized and fake reviews I'm against on principle, though. The less of those around the better, as far as I'm concerned. It might stay in a single thread here, but that won't stop people from repeating the information elsewhere, whether it's true or false.
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
- 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM
2092 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM
696 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM
780 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option?
- 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM
1329 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM*
- 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM
709 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
- 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM
1207 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM*
- 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM
697 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM*
- 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM
683 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM*
- 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM
1157 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess
- 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM
1299 Views
No
- 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM
1271 Views
I think you missread the rules...
- 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
1723 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work?
- 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM
1255 Views
I'm strongly against it
- 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM
1438 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list
- 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM
1384 Views
- 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM
1384 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
- 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM
1270 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
- 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM
1196 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
- 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM
1383 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
- 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM
1425 Views
I had no idea about these legalities.
- 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM
1221 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities.
- 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM
1160 Views
Good to know.
- 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM
1358 Views
Re: Good to know.
- 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM
1246 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak.
- 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM
1209 Views
Ever hear of Napster?
- 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM
1127 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
- 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM
1338 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
- 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM
1482 Views

*NM*