Active Users:468 Time:09/11/2025 06:15:46 PM
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1892 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1215 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 584 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1143 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 581 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 976 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 602 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 632 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 712 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 643 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 647 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 601 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 645 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 991 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 577 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 582 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1112 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 596 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1014 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1316 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 577 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 566 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 571 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 619 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1019 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 636 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 954 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 578 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 588 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 575 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 547 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1052 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1000 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 987 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 618 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1069 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1526 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1049 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1241 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1143 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1057 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 998 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1182 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1418 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1034 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1201 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 937 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1023 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 920 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1143 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1253 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1033 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1126 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 930 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1007 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 554 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 990 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 925 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1124 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1211 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 975 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1278 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1094 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1003 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 595 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 561 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 567 Views

Reply to Message