Active Users:816 Time:08/02/2026 11:54:36 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1962 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 639 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1289 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 626 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1220 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 613 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1038 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 669 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 672 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 747 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 704 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 668 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 674 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 648 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 688 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 1177 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 648 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1064 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 611 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 624 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1186 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 634 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1076 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1384 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 626 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 600 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 629 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 602 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 650 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1100 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 672 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1026 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 606 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 623 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 609 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 610 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 588 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1143 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1063 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1055 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 1076 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 1169 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 657 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1159 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1595 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1134 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1317 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1238 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1132 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1059 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1252 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1478 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1115 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1288 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 995 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1098 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1021 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1220 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1324 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1119 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1189 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1004 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1077 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 595 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1066 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 989 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1202 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1292 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1038 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1345 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1167 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1075 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 626 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 594 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 599 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes