Active Users:581 Time:12/05/2026 01:00:42 PM
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2026 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1348 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 661 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1296 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 647 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1099 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 696 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 702 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 787 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 704 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 709 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 683 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 721 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1131 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 647 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 649 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1245 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 666 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1132 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1455 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 660 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 630 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 639 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 685 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1161 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 700 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1091 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 635 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 655 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 644 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 616 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1206 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1134 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1126 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 688 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1223 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1657 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1202 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1379 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1317 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1212 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1135 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1317 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1546 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1183 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1362 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1055 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1163 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1089 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1290 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1387 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1186 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1250 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1067 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1148 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 626 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1133 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1057 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1269 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1358 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1097 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1413 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1240 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1133 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 661 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 630 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 630 Views

Reply to Message