Active Users:1589 Time:25/12/2025 02:33:41 PM
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1925 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1249 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 608 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1179 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 597 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1006 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 645 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 656 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 732 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 659 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 665 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 628 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 672 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1030 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 597 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 607 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1146 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 619 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1041 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1355 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 614 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 587 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 590 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 636 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1065 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 660 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 984 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 596 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 609 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 597 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 572 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1103 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1036 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1023 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 644 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1118 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1556 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1092 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1275 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1192 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1096 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1025 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1214 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1452 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1081 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1242 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 968 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1061 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 965 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1187 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1293 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1074 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1153 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 968 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1040 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 580 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1028 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 950 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1157 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1249 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1007 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1310 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1132 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1043 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 612 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 578 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 581 Views

Reply to Message