Active Users:484 Time:27/03/2026 10:01:24 AM
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst Send a noteboard - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM
Much as I dislike disparaging someone elses review of a book, I'd imagine a majority of the people here that voted yes would have been happy for no further reviews if it weren't for the how little the TGS review from Jason can be trusted.

And that is all due to the now infamous review of Crossroads of Twilight by him. That implied the book was going to be packed with action and events, marking a return to the pace of books 1-6.

As these are going to be spoiler free reviews, I can clearly state (and I wouldn't be the only one), that my reason for wanting to see other reviews pre-release is to see just how accurate his TGS review is. Ie. is TGS REALLY as fast paced as KOD, is it that much darker? Is there a scene most will think is dramatic, etc.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1995 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1311 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 638 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1257 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 625 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1062 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 682 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 685 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 765 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 681 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 689 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 667 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 703 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1087 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 627 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 633 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1211 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 648 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1097 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1415 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 643 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 613 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 614 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 664 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1131 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 683 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1047 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 618 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 634 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 627 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 598 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1167 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1091 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1084 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 671 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1186 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1617 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1165 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1344 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1284 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1167 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1093 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1280 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1506 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1143 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1326 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1019 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1128 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1051 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1253 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1349 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1151 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1212 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1032 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1106 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 605 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1100 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1023 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1233 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1317 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1060 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1378 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1208 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1099 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 641 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 609 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 616 Views

Reply to Message