Active Users:442 Time:10/08/2026 09:23:28 PM
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst Send a noteboard - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM
Much as I dislike disparaging someone elses review of a book, I'd imagine a majority of the people here that voted yes would have been happy for no further reviews if it weren't for the how little the TGS review from Jason can be trusted.

And that is all due to the now infamous review of Crossroads of Twilight by him. That implied the book was going to be packed with action and events, marking a return to the pace of books 1-6.

As these are going to be spoiler free reviews, I can clearly state (and I wouldn't be the only one), that my reason for wanting to see other reviews pre-release is to see just how accurate his TGS review is. Ie. is TGS REALLY as fast paced as KOD, is it that much darker? Is there a scene most will think is dramatic, etc.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2094 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1433 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 697 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1351 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 711 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1163 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 724 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 745 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 838 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 752 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 746 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 720 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 761 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1208 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 688 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 685 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1316 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 721 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1190 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1541 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 698 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 668 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 676 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 729 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1227 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 742 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1137 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 669 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 696 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 690 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 652 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1282 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1199 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1186 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 730 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1271 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1724 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1255 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1440 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1386 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1270 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1198 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1386 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1604 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1255 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1428 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1106 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1222 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1160 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1359 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1452 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1246 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1329 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1138 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1191 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 656 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1209 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1127 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1339 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1448 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1148 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1483 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1319 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1192 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 694 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 676 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 664 Views

Reply to Message