Active Users:292 Time:11/05/2024 10:15:09 PM
Probably darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 08/12/2012 02:46:15 PM
I don't think someone somewhat weaker than the Foresaken needs MUCH more skill than the Foresaken to threaten them. Such a person doesn't even need more skill at all. If your skill is Foresaken level, and you're not much weaker, you're a threat. Will the stronger Foresaken have an advantage? Obviously. Will they simply be able to overwhelm you? No.

For example, I don't think Egwene is currently more skillful than the Foresaken. But in a head on duel, she's going to be a challenge to face, and its probably the greater knowledge of the Foresaken that will save the day, not their extra skill.


Although I'd say knowledge and skill amount to the same thing here. The point being Egwene has enough of a strength and skill combination to not be easy meat, but in the end the stronger, more experienced Channeler is going to win out. The only way someone like Egwene poses a threat to one of the Forsaken (angreal etc aside) is is they have significantly more skill/knowledge to fall back on. I think Cadsuane level could be a threat with enough skill, hard to say if Moiraine's level could stand a chance though. I'm inclined to say not against someone with the skill of the Forsaken, but against someone like Alivia probably.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
This message last edited by darius_sedai on 08/12/2012 at 02:47:22 PM
Reply to message
I really hate to bring up strength in the OP, but thankfully it doesn't regard Egwene or any women. - 04/12/2012 06:01:45 AM 1621 Views
My thoughts - 04/12/2012 07:15:44 AM 1014 Views
90 is REALLY high - 04/12/2012 07:25:15 AM 984 Views
Couple of things ... **reminder that this is a lot of speculation** - 04/12/2012 04:29:50 PM 931 Views
Narishma is definitely stronger, you're right. - 07/12/2012 03:00:53 AM 889 Views
He was stronger than Aginor in order to channel the power of the Eye - 07/12/2012 03:00:10 PM 817 Views
No I don't think so - 07/12/2012 04:13:48 PM 752 Views
I'd say more than 80 - 07/12/2012 07:07:32 PM 709 Views
81 then - 07/12/2012 08:11:34 PM 637 Views
and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 07/12/2012 09:13:42 PM 731 Views
Re: and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 07/12/2012 10:14:53 PM 751 Views
there were more like MILLIONS of Forsaken during these times - 07/12/2012 10:30:34 PM 686 Views
Re: and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 28/12/2012 08:44:51 PM 528 Views
Aginors defeat could be a result of multiple factors. So can Ishmaels - 07/12/2012 01:24:18 PM 756 Views
Regardless, Rand was clearly in the same strength category when Aginor and he faced off - 07/12/2012 03:03:04 PM 722 Views
I disagree. - 07/12/2012 06:55:43 PM 652 Views
Aginor burned out trying to use the Eye in the real world - 07/12/2012 07:12:44 PM 661 Views
Re: Aginor burned out trying to use the Eye in the real world - 07/12/2012 07:51:37 PM 650 Views
he faced Asmodean strength for strength before Rahvin - 07/12/2012 09:23:42 PM 752 Views
Just to be a bitch - 07/12/2012 10:17:11 PM 590 Views
you don't actually have to tell us all you are a bitch - 07/12/2012 10:36:25 PM 760 Views
*NM* - 08/12/2012 06:22:49 AM 615 Views
think youre misjudgjng the benefits of the link. they dont have to add up to 90. - 07/12/2012 12:34:59 PM 718 Views
There is also no why to tell if Flinn hit Demandred with all the strength available to him either - 07/12/2012 03:05:38 PM 722 Views
the "circle" was stronger but the individuals weren't *NM* - 07/12/2012 06:58:38 PM 467 Views
that's what I just said *NM* - 07/12/2012 07:23:34 PM 396 Views
that was not clear *NM* - 07/12/2012 07:43:54 PM 487 Views
*shrug* - 07/12/2012 09:25:00 PM 599 Views
Re: *shrug* - 10/12/2012 11:27:42 PM 703 Views
If I had said the individuals in the circle added to Dmandreds strength perhaps - 11/12/2012 03:28:23 AM 752 Views
in the context of this discussion you did not distinguish between the effective strength and - 11/12/2012 07:10:48 PM 650 Views
whatever ... didn't think it was necessary ... and with that I'm done - 11/12/2012 09:16:03 PM 624 Views
- 17/12/2012 11:22:55 PM 863 Views
About Rand's strength... an important quote is being ignored: - 08/12/2012 12:37:38 AM 850 Views
Perhaps - 08/12/2012 01:01:21 AM 670 Views
Re: Perhaps - 08/12/2012 02:06:39 AM 734 Views
Like I said ... Could be - 08/12/2012 02:33:43 AM 724 Views
I disagree... - 08/12/2012 04:53:09 AM 663 Views
Re: I disagree... - 08/12/2012 05:20:08 AM 610 Views
I disagree again! - 08/12/2012 05:49:15 AM 679 Views
Probably - 08/12/2012 02:46:15 PM 716 Views
Re: Probably - 09/12/2012 07:51:59 PM 698 Views
Not really - 09/12/2012 10:13:07 PM 623 Views
Re: Not really - 10/12/2012 01:05:54 AM 646 Views
Re: Not really - 13/12/2012 03:58:48 PM 728 Views
I don't think the Forsaken are good examples - 08/12/2012 06:18:45 AM 701 Views
We're essentially saying the same thing now - 08/12/2012 02:37:17 PM 623 Views
Re: I don't think the Forsaken are good examples - 28/12/2012 08:08:21 PM 608 Views
Always thought the forsaken didn't really know much about Rand - 08/12/2012 02:38:08 AM 655 Views
And they had plenty of spies around him and clearly knew that he managed - 08/12/2012 02:43:15 AM 678 Views
Re: And they had plenty of spies around him and clearly knew that he managed - 08/12/2012 05:34:54 AM 642 Views
Who can say. Graendal wraps them so deep in compulsion that she can dig - 08/12/2012 05:42:39 AM 712 Views
Oops, double post. *NM* - 08/12/2012 09:34:36 AM 488 Views
Re: About Rand's strength... an important quote is being ignored: - 11/12/2012 11:36:51 PM 692 Views
Re: Rand v Aginor - 16/12/2012 01:46:08 PM 661 Views
Not a bad theory and I've read it before - 16/12/2012 07:42:31 PM 615 Views

Reply to Message