Active Users:232 Time:11/05/2024 08:04:24 AM
in the context of this discussion you did not distinguish between the effective strength and Onarishma Send a noteboard - 11/12/2012 07:10:48 PM
not sure how it can be more clear than this statement:

"Personally I think those circles needed to be significantly Stronger than an individual Forsaken for the Rand's people to have survived."


ummm... a circle is made up of people the "strength" of the circle is the combined strength of the people in the circle. I was saying that the combined strength of the circle does not have to equal Demandreds strength in order to have a stronger EFFECT than Demandred. Are we on the same page yet.

If Demandreds strength is 95 its sounded like you were saying the circle memebers combined strength had to add up to more than 95 in order to be effective against him. Im saying that the combined strength could be less than 95. They could have been at 65-70 but the effect of the circle would still be able to match or overwhelm a 95.


I specifically noted the circle's strength ... We have no way of knowing how much advantage a circle gives, the individuals could added up to 60 or 150 for all we really know. We can't even accurately guess at anyone in the circle's individual strength. All we know for fact is that Demandred believes the first few weaves Flinn hit him with were as powerful as what Demandred could generate. Those weaves could have been 100% as powerful as Flinns circle could create or 50% as powerful or anywhere else. we have no way of knowing and we know the Forsaken have a tendency to lie to themselves which means those weaves could have been stronger than Demandreds weaves.


the actual strength. potency versus quantity. If you meant potency thats all well and good but there are enough people here who don't believe in potency being different from quantity and so as I said you were not clear. Making thing bold would mean nothing to someone who believed that potency and quantity were equivalent in a circle.
Reply to message
I really hate to bring up strength in the OP, but thankfully it doesn't regard Egwene or any women. - 04/12/2012 06:01:45 AM 1620 Views
My thoughts - 04/12/2012 07:15:44 AM 1014 Views
90 is REALLY high - 04/12/2012 07:25:15 AM 984 Views
Couple of things ... **reminder that this is a lot of speculation** - 04/12/2012 04:29:50 PM 930 Views
Narishma is definitely stronger, you're right. - 07/12/2012 03:00:53 AM 887 Views
He was stronger than Aginor in order to channel the power of the Eye - 07/12/2012 03:00:10 PM 816 Views
No I don't think so - 07/12/2012 04:13:48 PM 751 Views
I'd say more than 80 - 07/12/2012 07:07:32 PM 708 Views
81 then - 07/12/2012 08:11:34 PM 635 Views
and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 07/12/2012 09:13:42 PM 729 Views
Re: and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 07/12/2012 10:14:53 PM 751 Views
there were more like MILLIONS of Forsaken during these times - 07/12/2012 10:30:34 PM 686 Views
Re: and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 28/12/2012 08:44:51 PM 528 Views
Aginors defeat could be a result of multiple factors. So can Ishmaels - 07/12/2012 01:24:18 PM 755 Views
Regardless, Rand was clearly in the same strength category when Aginor and he faced off - 07/12/2012 03:03:04 PM 722 Views
I disagree. - 07/12/2012 06:55:43 PM 651 Views
Aginor burned out trying to use the Eye in the real world - 07/12/2012 07:12:44 PM 661 Views
Re: Aginor burned out trying to use the Eye in the real world - 07/12/2012 07:51:37 PM 650 Views
he faced Asmodean strength for strength before Rahvin - 07/12/2012 09:23:42 PM 749 Views
Just to be a bitch - 07/12/2012 10:17:11 PM 590 Views
you don't actually have to tell us all you are a bitch - 07/12/2012 10:36:25 PM 759 Views
*NM* - 08/12/2012 06:22:49 AM 615 Views
think youre misjudgjng the benefits of the link. they dont have to add up to 90. - 07/12/2012 12:34:59 PM 715 Views
There is also no why to tell if Flinn hit Demandred with all the strength available to him either - 07/12/2012 03:05:38 PM 722 Views
the "circle" was stronger but the individuals weren't *NM* - 07/12/2012 06:58:38 PM 467 Views
that's what I just said *NM* - 07/12/2012 07:23:34 PM 396 Views
that was not clear *NM* - 07/12/2012 07:43:54 PM 487 Views
*shrug* - 07/12/2012 09:25:00 PM 596 Views
Re: *shrug* - 10/12/2012 11:27:42 PM 702 Views
If I had said the individuals in the circle added to Dmandreds strength perhaps - 11/12/2012 03:28:23 AM 750 Views
in the context of this discussion you did not distinguish between the effective strength and - 11/12/2012 07:10:48 PM 650 Views
whatever ... didn't think it was necessary ... and with that I'm done - 11/12/2012 09:16:03 PM 622 Views
- 17/12/2012 11:22:55 PM 862 Views
About Rand's strength... an important quote is being ignored: - 08/12/2012 12:37:38 AM 848 Views
Perhaps - 08/12/2012 01:01:21 AM 670 Views
Re: Perhaps - 08/12/2012 02:06:39 AM 733 Views
Like I said ... Could be - 08/12/2012 02:33:43 AM 723 Views
I disagree... - 08/12/2012 04:53:09 AM 662 Views
Re: I disagree... - 08/12/2012 05:20:08 AM 610 Views
I disagree again! - 08/12/2012 05:49:15 AM 679 Views
Probably - 08/12/2012 02:46:15 PM 715 Views
Re: Probably - 09/12/2012 07:51:59 PM 697 Views
Not really - 09/12/2012 10:13:07 PM 622 Views
Re: Not really - 10/12/2012 01:05:54 AM 645 Views
Re: Not really - 13/12/2012 03:58:48 PM 726 Views
I don't think the Forsaken are good examples - 08/12/2012 06:18:45 AM 699 Views
We're essentially saying the same thing now - 08/12/2012 02:37:17 PM 623 Views
Re: I don't think the Forsaken are good examples - 28/12/2012 08:08:21 PM 608 Views
Always thought the forsaken didn't really know much about Rand - 08/12/2012 02:38:08 AM 654 Views
And they had plenty of spies around him and clearly knew that he managed - 08/12/2012 02:43:15 AM 676 Views
Re: And they had plenty of spies around him and clearly knew that he managed - 08/12/2012 05:34:54 AM 640 Views
Who can say. Graendal wraps them so deep in compulsion that she can dig - 08/12/2012 05:42:39 AM 712 Views
Oops, double post. *NM* - 08/12/2012 09:34:36 AM 488 Views
Re: About Rand's strength... an important quote is being ignored: - 11/12/2012 11:36:51 PM 691 Views
Re: Rand v Aginor - 16/12/2012 01:46:08 PM 660 Views
Not a bad theory and I've read it before - 16/12/2012 07:42:31 PM 615 Views

Reply to Message