Active Users:1517 Time:14/08/2026 08:35:51 AM
I disagree slightly Larry Send a noteboard - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM
I think it's worthy of being discussed for exactly the reasons you point out - about how devoid of form, style, and ultimately substance. I'm halfway through the French original and I'm finding myself thinking that the 19th century serial style does not make for the most conducive of storytelling delivery methods.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion. - 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM 1859 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste) - 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM 1376 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books. - 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM 1441 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M. - 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM 1452 Views
Agreed. Madame Bovary is serious literature. - 10/01/2010 01:02:34 AM 1302 Views
Are you nuts!!?? - 10/01/2010 08:37:47 AM 1578 Views
I wanted to do that too. - 10/01/2010 01:24:42 AM 1231 Views
It's bloody marvellous. *NM* - 10/01/2010 08:05:47 AM 603 Views
Our next discussions will have preselected options. - 10/01/2010 01:00:59 AM 1409 Views
I heartily support the move from democracy to oligarchy! - 10/01/2010 01:04:13 AM 1346 Views
I agree. - 10/01/2010 08:01:33 AM 1297 Views
I disagree slightly - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM 1285 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate. - 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM 1336 Views
I think you misunderstand my intent - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM 1379 Views
You poopyhead! - 10/01/2010 01:19:11 AM 1451 Views
Oh, I almost forgot - 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM 1306 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM* - 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM 529 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM 1407 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book. - 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM 1261 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book - 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM 1271 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM 1185 Views
Re: Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:52:29 PM 1552 Views
I like Eco's distinction between light fiction and literature. - 12/01/2010 04:16:38 PM 1404 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM 1473 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM 1184 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM 1517 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well. - 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM 1386 Views
In which case... - 12/01/2010 05:22:34 PM 1157 Views
Yes - 13/01/2010 07:56:08 PM 1437 Views
Not really. - 15/01/2010 01:18:10 PM 1609 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed. - 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM 1523 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps. - 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM 1394 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine. - 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM 1427 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator? - 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM 1350 Views
Heh. - 11/01/2010 07:49:47 AM 1245 Views
I'd laugh... - 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM 1127 Views
Tom is the primary reason I want an ignore feature again. - 12/01/2010 02:17:29 AM 1174 Views
I'm glad to hear that. *NM* - 12/01/2010 04:17:30 PM 553 Views
And so you've reached this decision about Tom... - 18/01/2010 10:10:44 PM 1365 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion. - 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM 1476 Views
It's frustrating though... - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM 1418 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM 1437 Views
Perhaps. - 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM 1133 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. - 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM 1189 Views
I was mostly just giving an example. - 12/01/2010 06:14:04 AM 1286 Views
You're not. - 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM 1231 Views
Her next series sounds interesting - 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM 1128 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic. - 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM 1170 Views
Yes, but how so? - 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM 1249 Views
Well... - 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM 1335 Views
Honestly... - 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM 1336 Views
Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM 1461 Views
Re: Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM 1310 Views
ah i didn't realize it was already out - 13/01/2010 11:44:53 PM 1130 Views
'tis. - 14/01/2010 12:56:11 PM 1493 Views
I really don't think it would. - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM 1328 Views
I have tried before. - 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM 1214 Views
That's bullshit - 12/01/2010 11:12:55 PM 1364 Views
True, true. - 16/01/2010 08:54:16 AM 1077 Views
Luckily for you... - 16/01/2010 08:59:23 AM 1476 Views
Re: "Omigod you read light fantasy?" - 18/01/2010 10:04:41 PM 1541 Views
Har. *NM* - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM 724 Views
I'm quite enjoying it. - 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM 1346 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion. - 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM 1239 Views
I have to agree - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM 1343 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM* - 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM 543 Views
It was half bullshit, you must understand - 11/01/2010 03:59:42 PM 1227 Views
Come on, there is lovely tragedy there... - 13/01/2010 07:32:49 PM 1169 Views
I am pleased to be referenced in a cross-board discussion. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:29:45 PM 679 Views

Reply to Message