Active Users:1069 Time:11/02/2026 12:10:16 AM
Logic classes would be good in schools. Timthetrolloc Send a noteboard - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM
Blatant lies about 9/11 should not be encouraged but scientific studies were not done or were not done very well into many of the problems some people have with what exactly happened that day.

A few problems I would have liked to see studied in depth during the tragedy.

1. Why did WTC tower number 7 fall at all?

2. Why was there Thermite in the rubble of the two towers?

3. When steel skyscrapers caught fire in the past why didn't they fall when 3 skyscrapers fell on September 11, 2001 that were on fire.

4. Secondary explosions were heard by witnesses in New York on 9/11. What was the cause of these disturbances?

What is the Logic behind not thoroughly investigating exactly what happened? I would like to think a logical person would want the right questions asked and not put up with answers that are not logical explanations of observable phenomenon.
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1377 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 917 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 953 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 872 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 995 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 933 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 837 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 1001 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 880 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 932 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 1026 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 904 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 1007 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 822 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 864 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 880 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 942 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 921 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 900 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 938 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 762 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 931 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 871 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 997 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 805 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 843 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 1010 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 945 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 897 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 944 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 888 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 913 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 972 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 946 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 868 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 897 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 914 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 995 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 987 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 850 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 925 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 867 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 1012 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 420 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 866 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 895 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 885 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 860 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 893 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 900 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 466 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 917 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 782 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 943 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 816 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 841 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 909 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 821 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 960 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 450 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 863 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 393 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 1083 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 881 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 1066 Views

Reply to Message