Active Users:477 Time:03/05/2025 03:16:24 AM
But how else would they fall down? Aeryn Send a noteboard - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM
I went to an engineering/architecture school, so there was a lot of discussion in class of why/how they collapsed. It may seem strange or unexpected that it fell straight down, but really, how else would they fall? Why would you expect the building to fall sideways? The problem happened when the support struts melted and the top chunk of the building collapsed onto the floor below - collapsed straight down, as gravity would have it do. That floor couldn't hold, and also fell down.

The "explosions" would just be the noise (tremendous defeaning noise) of the buildling collapsing. Each floor, in fact, as it crashed onto the next one, one by one, would sound like an explosion. (Especially to a traumatized layperson. For what it's worth, the sound of the airplane approaching the building was just like the whistling of the bombs that I've seen in movies to me. The way the ground shook too. So if I didn't know any better, based on my eyewitness account, I might have said that the planes dropped bombs.)
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1284 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 833 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 863 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 788 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 903 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 820 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 742 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 904 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 780 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 830 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 935 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 816 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 886 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 733 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 745 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 795 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 854 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 842 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 818 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 822 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 682 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 829 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 787 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 893 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 725 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 756 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 859 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 867 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 814 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 847 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 799 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 825 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 857 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 845 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 793 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 813 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 805 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 907 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 897 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 746 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 821 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 789 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 906 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 377 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 757 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 798 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 780 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 772 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 819 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 794 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 416 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 840 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 693 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 861 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 724 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 760 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 799 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 734 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 854 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 412 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 758 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 328 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 998 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 796 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 964 Views

Reply to Message