Yes absolutely- it's fun and it's only 100% true as long as every single step is perfectly correct. I really like reading passages of Simone de Beauvoir's "The Second Sex" because she postulates something then she goes from A to B to C and every single step along the way is reasonable but before you know it she's proved something that seems incredible. It's really fun to back track.
And it's not just that sometimes we go beyond facts and then reach opinion, I think that in our daily lives it's even more common that we *start* with the opinions. There's no logic in a vacuum, you have to start somewhere. Even with the geometry proofs, there's a set of givens that you have.Our starting points are different because of our opinions and experiences, etc. Perhaps we then try to untagle ourselves with reason and logic and evidence, and sometimes that will allow paths to converge, and sometimes not. They may even grow further apart.
And it's not just that sometimes we go beyond facts and then reach opinion, I think that in our daily lives it's even more common that we *start* with the opinions. There's no logic in a vacuum, you have to start somewhere. Even with the geometry proofs, there's a set of givens that you have.Our starting points are different because of our opinions and experiences, etc. Perhaps we then try to untagle ourselves with reason and logic and evidence, and sometimes that will allow paths to converge, and sometimes not. They may even grow further apart.
Back when I was doing high school math, I would do the geometry proofs just for fun. There was something great about piecing together the puzzle and being forced to follow every step, every rule that built on top of the rule before it, leading you to the inevitable and correct conclusion.
I had never thought of geometry proofs in relation to common sense in that manner before. Starting from basic principles and adding only true principles on top until you reach an answer, or until you reach a point where there is no definitely true principle to guide you on, in which case you are now at the point where subjective thinking takes over and everything is an opinion, sometimes educated and sometimes not.
I had never thought of geometry proofs in relation to common sense in that manner before. Starting from basic principles and adding only true principles on top until you reach an answer, or until you reach a point where there is no definitely true principle to guide you on, in which case you are now at the point where subjective thinking takes over and everything is an opinion, sometimes educated and sometimes not.
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools.
- 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM
1505 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools.
- 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM
1009 Views
Ugh.
- 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM
1049 Views
Re: Ugh.
- 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM
988 Views
Something tells me that no matter who answered your questions you wouldn't believe anyway.
- 21/09/2011 02:16:52 AM
961 Views
this is a controlled demolition
- 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM
1101 Views
I've seen controlled demolitions in person. They happen in the opposite order of the WTC collapses.
- 21/09/2011 03:54:35 AM
1043 Views
Agreed
- 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM
968 Views
I've long advocated this for the reasons Tom states as well as others.
- 21/09/2011 06:49:28 AM
908 Views
I don't know if the Internet is degrading skills, or just giving stupid people a voice
- 20/09/2011 02:33:24 PM
1049 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed
- 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM
1033 Views
No, there is not.
- 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM
1146 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least
- 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM
1015 Views
As far as conspiracies go ...
- 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM
1109 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid?
- 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM
913 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist.
- 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM
969 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11
- 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM
979 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence.
- 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM
1076 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed
- 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM
1013 Views
But that's what I DID argue.
- 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM
1016 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms
- 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM
1059 Views
I've always seen them as separate.
- 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM
863 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member.
- 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM
1104 Views
I'm still annoyed.
- 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM
902 Views
I stopped responfding when suddenly realized I didn't want to be in a Bush Iraq war debate
- 21/09/2011 02:53:29 PM
901 Views
and I pointed that it was was just continuin gthe Clinton policy
- 21/09/2011 02:30:13 PM
979 Views
Even if that were true, it would still be flip flopping on a central Bush platform plank.
- 21/09/2011 05:45:10 PM
1036 Views
In addition:
- 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM
1123 Views
Contemplate this....
- 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM
1005 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me
- 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM
1022 Views
- 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM
1022 Views
You should watch the pilot episode of the X-Files spin-off series The Lone Gunmen.
- 20/09/2011 08:19:15 PM
1059 Views
Make 'em all take debate.
- 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM
972 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools.
- 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM
1003 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...?
- 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM
974 Views
Not actually the best example
- 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM
980 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building?
- 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM
982 Views
The fireproofing was scraped off the steel by the crash, so the beams melted.
- 21/09/2011 07:35:08 PM
1185 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...?
- 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM
1015 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses?
- 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM
1026 Views
You could still argue.
- 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM
917 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person
- 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM
929 Views
- 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM
929 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math.
- 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM
924 Views
I love geometry proofs.
- 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM
1077 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version.
- 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM
961 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid.
- 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM
1200 Views
I really and truly appreciate your love of pure math for math's sake, but...
- 21/09/2011 11:10:03 PM
981 Views
Well, it requires a lot more science to really dispute things than HS can give someone
- 21/09/2011 11:28:29 PM
979 Views
