Yes absolutely- it's fun and it's only 100% true as long as every single step is perfectly correct. I really like reading passages of Simone de Beauvoir's "The Second Sex" because she postulates something then she goes from A to B to C and every single step along the way is reasonable but before you know it she's proved something that seems incredible. It's really fun to back track.
And it's not just that sometimes we go beyond facts and then reach opinion, I think that in our daily lives it's even more common that we *start* with the opinions. There's no logic in a vacuum, you have to start somewhere. Even with the geometry proofs, there's a set of givens that you have.Our starting points are different because of our opinions and experiences, etc. Perhaps we then try to untagle ourselves with reason and logic and evidence, and sometimes that will allow paths to converge, and sometimes not. They may even grow further apart.
And it's not just that sometimes we go beyond facts and then reach opinion, I think that in our daily lives it's even more common that we *start* with the opinions. There's no logic in a vacuum, you have to start somewhere. Even with the geometry proofs, there's a set of givens that you have.Our starting points are different because of our opinions and experiences, etc. Perhaps we then try to untagle ourselves with reason and logic and evidence, and sometimes that will allow paths to converge, and sometimes not. They may even grow further apart.
Back when I was doing high school math, I would do the geometry proofs just for fun. There was something great about piecing together the puzzle and being forced to follow every step, every rule that built on top of the rule before it, leading you to the inevitable and correct conclusion.
I had never thought of geometry proofs in relation to common sense in that manner before. Starting from basic principles and adding only true principles on top until you reach an answer, or until you reach a point where there is no definitely true principle to guide you on, in which case you are now at the point where subjective thinking takes over and everything is an opinion, sometimes educated and sometimes not.
I had never thought of geometry proofs in relation to common sense in that manner before. Starting from basic principles and adding only true principles on top until you reach an answer, or until you reach a point where there is no definitely true principle to guide you on, in which case you are now at the point where subjective thinking takes over and everything is an opinion, sometimes educated and sometimes not.
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools.
- 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM
1361 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools.
- 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM
904 Views
Ugh.
- 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM
938 Views
Re: Ugh.
- 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM
856 Views
Something tells me that no matter who answered your questions you wouldn't believe anyway.
- 21/09/2011 02:16:52 AM
854 Views
this is a controlled demolition
- 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM
976 Views
I've seen controlled demolitions in person. They happen in the opposite order of the WTC collapses.
- 21/09/2011 03:54:35 AM
928 Views
Agreed
- 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM
860 Views
I've long advocated this for the reasons Tom states as well as others.
- 21/09/2011 06:49:28 AM
803 Views
I don't know if the Internet is degrading skills, or just giving stupid people a voice
- 20/09/2011 02:33:24 PM
933 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed
- 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM
912 Views
No, there is not.
- 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM
1010 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least
- 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM
883 Views
As far as conspiracies go ...
- 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM
985 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid?
- 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM
806 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist.
- 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM
846 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11
- 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM
860 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence.
- 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM
925 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed
- 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM
903 Views
But that's what I DID argue.
- 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM
883 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms
- 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM
916 Views
I've always seen them as separate.
- 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM
749 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member.
- 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM
978 Views
I'm still annoyed.
- 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM
788 Views
I stopped responfding when suddenly realized I didn't want to be in a Bush Iraq war debate
- 21/09/2011 02:53:29 PM
790 Views
and I pointed that it was was just continuin gthe Clinton policy
- 21/09/2011 02:30:13 PM
873 Views
Even if that were true, it would still be flip flopping on a central Bush platform plank.
- 21/09/2011 05:45:10 PM
907 Views
In addition:
- 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM
986 Views
Contemplate this....
- 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM
876 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me
- 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM
894 Views
- 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM
894 Views
You should watch the pilot episode of the X-Files spin-off series The Lone Gunmen.
- 20/09/2011 08:19:15 PM
925 Views
Make 'em all take debate.
- 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM
851 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools.
- 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM
877 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...?
- 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM
870 Views
Not actually the best example
- 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM
844 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building?
- 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM
880 Views
The fireproofing was scraped off the steel by the crash, so the beams melted.
- 21/09/2011 07:35:08 PM
1065 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...?
- 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM
899 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses?
- 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM
924 Views
You could still argue.
- 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM
801 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person
- 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM
822 Views
- 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM
822 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math.
- 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM
803 Views
I love geometry proofs.
- 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM
943 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version.
- 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM
844 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid.
- 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM
1068 Views
I really and truly appreciate your love of pure math for math's sake, but...
- 21/09/2011 11:10:03 PM
839 Views
Well, it requires a lot more science to really dispute things than HS can give someone
- 21/09/2011 11:28:29 PM
867 Views
