Dear Ambassador Brinker,
We write to express our disappointment with Susan G. Komen for the Cure’s decision to cut funding for breast cancer prevention, screening, and education at Planned Parenthood health centers. This troubling decision threatens to reduce access to necessary, life-saving services. We urge Komen to reconsider its decision.
Planned Parenthood is a trusted provider of health care for women and men. More than 90 percent of the services provided by Planned Parenthood are primary and preventative including wellness exams and cancers screenings that save lives. Each year, Planned Parenthood health clinics provide 750,000 breast exams, 770,000 pap tests and nearly 4 million tests and treatments for sexually transmitted diseases. Twenty percent of all women in the U.S. have visited a Planned Parenthood health center.
For the past five years, grants to local affiliates of Planned Parenthood have been an important part of Planned Parenthood’s work to protect women from breast cancer. Komen funding for Planned Parenthood has provided nearly 170,000 clinical breast exams and resulted in 6,400 referrals for mammograms. In 2011 alone, grants from Komen provided Planned Parenthood with roughly $650,000 in funding for breast cancer prevention, screening, and education. According to a recent statement by Komen, “In some areas of the U.S., our affiliates have determined a Planned Parenthood clinic to be the best or only local place where women can receive breast health care.”
It would be tragic if any woman —let alone thousands of women — lost access to these potentially life-saving screenings because of a politically motivated attack.
We earnestly hope that you will put women’s health before partisan politics and reconsider this decision for the sake of the women who depend on both your organizations for access to the health care they need.
The letter is signed by Senators Lautenberg, Murray, Mikulski, Boxer, Cantwell, Gillibrand, Menendez, Wyden, Blumenthal, Shaheen, Begich, merkley, Tester, Akaka, Sanders, (Sherrod) Brown, Leahy, Baucus, Cardin, Feinstein, Franken, and Kerry.
Emphasis mine on 'partisan politics' because I find that horribly ironic in a letter signed by members of only one party.
Obviously the content of the deliberately public letter contains no threatening or inappropriate language, and I think we can skip formal analysis of it. I'm quite sure most of the signatories are speaking honestly and passionately here anyway, my issue is with them sending it at all.
One can usually rely on someone grabbing a shovel anyway
I'm not accusing them of anything illegal here, even on the off chance someone violated one of the various arcane rules. I'm not questioning their intent either. It is political pressure, and its directed at a private charity. I don't want throw too much mud but imagine if a major Rape charity cut funding to self-defense courses because the local dojo also ran a pistol range. I'd think it pretty screwed up if half the GOP senators wrote a public letter to them, and I'm pretty sure media reaction would be negative.
I won't deny Komen played a role in their own current mess, I'm just expressing generalized bitterness and cynicism about how good causes get hijacked, worsened by the fact that from a realistic perspective its often the best thing for the cause. I've no real fingers to point at anyone, this is just a dumb thing which happened.
We write to express our disappointment with Susan G. Komen for the Cure’s decision to cut funding for breast cancer prevention, screening, and education at Planned Parenthood health centers. This troubling decision threatens to reduce access to necessary, life-saving services. We urge Komen to reconsider its decision.
Planned Parenthood is a trusted provider of health care for women and men. More than 90 percent of the services provided by Planned Parenthood are primary and preventative including wellness exams and cancers screenings that save lives. Each year, Planned Parenthood health clinics provide 750,000 breast exams, 770,000 pap tests and nearly 4 million tests and treatments for sexually transmitted diseases. Twenty percent of all women in the U.S. have visited a Planned Parenthood health center.
For the past five years, grants to local affiliates of Planned Parenthood have been an important part of Planned Parenthood’s work to protect women from breast cancer. Komen funding for Planned Parenthood has provided nearly 170,000 clinical breast exams and resulted in 6,400 referrals for mammograms. In 2011 alone, grants from Komen provided Planned Parenthood with roughly $650,000 in funding for breast cancer prevention, screening, and education. According to a recent statement by Komen, “In some areas of the U.S., our affiliates have determined a Planned Parenthood clinic to be the best or only local place where women can receive breast health care.”
It would be tragic if any woman —let alone thousands of women — lost access to these potentially life-saving screenings because of a politically motivated attack.
We earnestly hope that you will put women’s health before partisan politics and reconsider this decision for the sake of the women who depend on both your organizations for access to the health care they need.
The letter is signed by Senators Lautenberg, Murray, Mikulski, Boxer, Cantwell, Gillibrand, Menendez, Wyden, Blumenthal, Shaheen, Begich, merkley, Tester, Akaka, Sanders, (Sherrod) Brown, Leahy, Baucus, Cardin, Feinstein, Franken, and Kerry.
Emphasis mine on 'partisan politics' because I find that horribly ironic in a letter signed by members of only one party.
Obviously the content of the deliberately public letter contains no threatening or inappropriate language, and I think we can skip formal analysis of it. I'm quite sure most of the signatories are speaking honestly and passionately here anyway, my issue is with them sending it at all.
Trying to appease all sides is usually a spectacular failure; one would have thought Obama had proven that (as big a football fan as he supposedly is one would have thought someone told him to dance with the one who brung him; oh, well.) At this point, their best bet is probably to shut up for a while and let things die down a bit before any more statements, since anything and everything they say now will just make it worse. The rule, though it can be demanding of ones discipline, is that when in a hole one should STOP DIGGING.
One can usually rely on someone grabbing a shovel anyway

Maybe I am cutting it too finely, but it makes a difference to me whether they used stamps or franking privileges. Senators should be allowed personal feelings and personal appeals apart from their offices so long as they do not involve the office. It sounds like these did, which would make it political pressure; not sure though.
I'm not accusing them of anything illegal here, even on the off chance someone violated one of the various arcane rules. I'm not questioning their intent either. It is political pressure, and its directed at a private charity. I don't want throw too much mud but imagine if a major Rape charity cut funding to self-defense courses because the local dojo also ran a pistol range. I'd think it pretty screwed up if half the GOP senators wrote a public letter to them, and I'm pretty sure media reaction would be negative.
Nature of the beast, but Komen set themselves up for it. Again, we should not pretend the decision happened in a vacuum. Also once again, I am forced to wonder why Komen bothered funding cancer screenings at Planned Parenthood in the first place since it seems to have made this day inevitable. Perhaps it was not inevitable from the start, but a certain small but vocal element within a certain political party made it so due to that partys connections with Komens founder. In that event, I am back to my last response to rt: However this ends, whether it was a political matter was decided the moment Komen made their first announcement (and the subsequent one you linked pretty much says that outright, without stating specific causes.)
I won't deny Komen played a role in their own current mess, I'm just expressing generalized bitterness and cynicism about how good causes get hijacked, worsened by the fact that from a realistic perspective its often the best thing for the cause. I've no real fingers to point at anyone, this is just a dumb thing which happened.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 04/02/2012 at 12:03:45 AM
Susan G. Komen cuts funds to Planned Parenthood. (with updated edit)
- 02/02/2012 04:32:27 PM
2406 Views
The most annoying part is in the sixth paragraph- abortions are only a small part of their thing
- 02/02/2012 05:08:07 PM
1286 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 05:20:17 PM
1168 Views
Actually, there are longer-acting forms of birth control than the pill.
- 03/02/2012 12:37:42 AM
1167 Views
I do think that preventing abortions is their primary goal.
- 03/02/2012 01:08:05 AM
1125 Views
If they don't see that link, it's because they haven't looked.
- 03/02/2012 02:42:42 AM
1231 Views
That is a little unfair.
- 03/02/2012 12:48:46 PM
1463 Views
Won't someone please think of the children?!
- 04/02/2012 05:03:27 AM
1215 Views
I think you're leaving out some important points.
- 04/02/2012 03:40:48 PM
1140 Views
Ah, the good ol' silent majority.
- 04/02/2012 07:32:29 PM
1131 Views
So which moron is feeding you this crap?
- 04/02/2012 10:27:15 PM
1185 Views
It worries me when we think alike....
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1226 Views
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1226 Views
Brain waves at 8 weeks are a myth.
- 05/02/2012 08:46:06 PM
1305 Views
"brain function... appears to be reliably present in the fetus at about eight weeks' gestation."
- 05/02/2012 10:42:35 PM
1219 Views
Oh please.
- 05/02/2012 11:13:50 PM
1169 Views
Re: Oh please yourself.
- 06/02/2012 09:15:26 PM
1043 Views
Quite a telling reply.
- 07/02/2012 04:38:20 AM
1141 Views
Re: I quite agree.
- 08/02/2012 06:03:23 PM
1339 Views
You're taking an issue of objective facts and treating it like a day of playground gossip.
- 09/02/2012 03:47:06 AM
1149 Views
No, your source, in which there is very little that is objective, did that for me.
- 11/02/2012 02:59:45 AM
1218 Views
I see you have continued to provide no factual arguments.
- 14/02/2012 04:53:28 AM
1476 Views
I presented factual rebuttals.
- 19/02/2012 01:56:45 AM
1238 Views
You continue to miss the point.
- 23/02/2012 10:22:24 PM
1330 Views
No, I got the point: You expect me to accept a heavily biased, partisan and combative "source."
- 07/03/2012 01:47:37 AM
1251 Views
The claim of brain waves at 8 weeks is still unsupported by evidence, i.e. a myth.
- 15/03/2012 09:16:14 PM
1314 Views
Well, yes.
- 04/02/2012 11:14:47 PM
1236 Views
A silent majority may as well not exist, if it has no tangible effects.
- 05/02/2012 12:54:34 AM
1157 Views
You ignoring it is not the same thing as it having no tangible effect.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:36 AM
1259 Views
Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 04/02/2012 08:25:49 PM
1311 Views
Re: Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:28 AM
1158 Views
If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 08:42:17 AM
1004 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 10:04:59 PM
1184 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 06/02/2012 08:57:38 PM
1127 Views
I'm done discussing my use of the term "oppression." The Tim Ryan stuff is interesting, though.
- 07/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
1259 Views
Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 08/02/2012 06:01:32 PM
1357 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 09/02/2012 05:30:58 AM
1210 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 11/02/2012 02:58:00 AM
1227 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 14/02/2012 04:29:08 AM
1323 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 19/02/2012 01:54:30 AM
1207 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 23/02/2012 10:59:32 PM
1528 Views
There are problems with the implants
- 03/02/2012 01:42:55 AM
1196 Views
Any form of birth control doesn't work for everyone, though.
- 03/02/2012 02:37:00 AM
1212 Views
Oh yes, I totally agree! My point is just that there are some barriers to handing out implants
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
559 Views
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
559 Views
What on earth does that have to do with anything?
- 03/02/2012 01:47:42 AM
1121 Views
I was actually kinda with you until you closed with that anathema I condemned in my response to rt.
- 03/02/2012 01:39:06 PM
1160 Views
I agree that they have made Beast Cancer a cult but splitting with PP is just smart
- 02/02/2012 05:39:49 PM
1338 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 06:00:17 PM
1124 Views
yes she is going to have to piss off one group or the other
- 02/02/2012 06:12:31 PM
1170 Views
Right
- 02/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1228 Views
it is a judgment call and I hope her decision is based on more than my guesses
- 02/02/2012 06:53:50 PM
1094 Views
Do you see a way Komen could have avoided pissing off one side?
- 02/02/2012 06:55:36 PM
1162 Views
No, I don't. I don't believe I said that?
- 02/02/2012 07:53:50 PM
1075 Views
You didn't; I inferred it from the way you phrased that ("if she HAS to..."). Sorry.
- 02/02/2012 08:06:11 PM
1178 Views
I know I'm not always clear.
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
1158 Views
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
1158 Views
Just curious...
- 02/02/2012 10:07:49 PM
1143 Views
Not at all.
- 02/02/2012 10:24:19 PM
1207 Views
Not at all?
- 02/02/2012 10:32:31 PM
1109 Views
No.
- 02/02/2012 10:47:04 PM
1045 Views
My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 02/02/2012 11:17:24 PM
1142 Views
Re: My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 03/02/2012 12:08:01 AM
1138 Views
wow that may be the worst advice I had in weeks
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
1119 Views
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
1119 Views
Ooor, the best.
- 03/02/2012 12:25:56 AM
1105 Views
ok now you are just being mean *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:46:12 AM
671 Views
The thread was going too well - I thought we needed the meanness. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 11:30:39 AM
625 Views
Never having heard of any of those except PP, my opinion may not be the most relevant...
- 02/02/2012 08:32:48 PM
1212 Views
You don't know stuff.
- 02/02/2012 08:43:38 PM
1198 Views
I know the stuff that matters.
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
1083 Views
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
1083 Views
they may also be a afraid that PP will go the way of ACORN
- 02/02/2012 11:04:16 PM
1233 Views
"Accused" of = unfounded slander.
- 03/02/2012 12:13:30 AM
1278 Views
did you notice I called tactic disgusting? That doesn't mean it isn't effective
- 03/02/2012 12:45:10 AM
1189 Views
The investigation by Congress is well-known to be specious. It's the House GOP abusing their power. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:41:58 AM
717 Views
This is so foreign a debate for me
- 02/02/2012 10:16:15 PM
1217 Views
Re: stuff
- 03/02/2012 09:18:53 AM
1084 Views
I'm sorry, but what're we talking about when we're talking about "cancer"
- 03/02/2012 12:49:34 PM
1145 Views
Obviously not adenocarcinoma, no.
- 04/02/2012 07:36:06 AM
1226 Views
I"m not that fussed. I'm just generally leary of research that has results like that
- 04/02/2012 08:35:04 PM
1084 Views
Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 10:54:34 PM
1192 Views
Re: Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 11:03:32 PM
1091 Views
After a little more digging I have to say you are probably right.
- 03/02/2012 02:23:14 AM
1031 Views
They restored funding incidentally
- 03/02/2012 05:43:47 PM
1099 Views
Unless I've missed it
- 03/02/2012 05:56:15 PM
1164 Views
You must have missed it then
- 03/02/2012 07:07:13 PM
1102 Views
If you're referring to Cannoli
- 03/02/2012 07:19:25 PM
1262 Views
Multiple was not an accidental choice of words
- 03/02/2012 11:46:30 PM
1144 Views
Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 12:41:42 AM
1176 Views
Re: Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 01:53:25 AM
1357 Views
well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1280 Views
Re: well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:29:34 PM
1056 Views
I do wonder a bit which lawmakers Fox thinks "pressured" Komen.
- 03/02/2012 08:29:50 PM
1093 Views
Beyond the 26 senators, I'd imagine rumor of the more reliable sort
- 03/02/2012 08:46:31 PM
1164 Views
Well, if they wrote AS senators rather than friends of Nancy Brinker, that probably qualifies.
- 03/02/2012 10:24:11 PM
1208 Views
Judge for yourself
- 04/02/2012 12:01:06 AM
1224 Views
Well, a public letter makes whether they signed it "Sen. so-and-so" irrelevant: It is political.
- 04/02/2012 04:07:20 PM
1133 Views
are you trying to disprove the study you posted?
- 03/02/2012 09:20:12 PM
1244 Views
To me, it depends on the nature of the contact, which I have not dug enough to discover.
- 03/02/2012 10:43:45 PM
1104 Views
you admit you have no incite into what happened
- 04/02/2012 04:27:17 AM
1175 Views
Actually, it looks like Komens new VP (and former GOP GA gubernatorial candidate) had the incite.
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1188 Views
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1188 Views
educated guess don't work when you are tinfoil hat wearing kool-aid drinker
- 04/02/2012 09:33:49 PM
1116 Views


*NM*