Sykes attacks specific claims (not the people making them) because they are being used as ammunition by "pro-lifers" who will latch on to any support for their epistemologically bankrupt position on what qualifies as a person. Her main point throughout the article is that making a claim based on letters or speeches is a recipe for misinterpretation of the original results which those secondary sources cite. You continue to dispute her actual conclusions (generally supported with direct quotes from research) with only baseless accusations of bias.

Some "pro-lifers" make claims about brain waves in fetuses. A careful trace of the citations finds that the original research does not support those claims. Further research into fetal brain development also fails to support those claims. If you can't dispute any of this on factual grounds, and it's clear that you can't, the rest of your ad hominem "she's attacking these doctors, but she just writes articles for About.com!" is just noise and distraction.