But if I'm recalling correctly, we're not talking BPH here either. As far as skewing the results, how else would you get data? I mean, it's not like they're going to go around to healthy fifty year olds and remove their prostates to screen. 
So yeah, I'm sure that was a consideration as well, and I'm posting it just as a way to back up my "rather safe than sorry" philosophy.
Unfortunately, I don't have the source; it was presented at a pathology conference I was lucky enough to attend. If I find more information about the study, I will certainly send it to you if you like.
So yeah, I'm sure that was a consideration as well, and I'm posting it just as a way to back up my "rather safe than sorry" philosophy. Unfortunately, I don't have the source; it was presented at a pathology conference I was lucky enough to attend. If I find more information about the study, I will certainly send it to you if you like.
Atheism is a religion like abstinence is a sex position. - Bill Maher
Susan G. Komen cuts funds to Planned Parenthood. (with updated edit)
- 02/02/2012 04:32:27 PM
2127 Views
The most annoying part is in the sixth paragraph- abortions are only a small part of their thing
- 02/02/2012 05:08:07 PM
991 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 05:20:17 PM
931 Views
Actually, there are longer-acting forms of birth control than the pill.
- 03/02/2012 12:37:42 AM
908 Views
I do think that preventing abortions is their primary goal.
- 03/02/2012 01:08:05 AM
875 Views
If they don't see that link, it's because they haven't looked.
- 03/02/2012 02:42:42 AM
946 Views
That is a little unfair.
- 03/02/2012 12:48:46 PM
1153 Views
Won't someone please think of the children?!
- 04/02/2012 05:03:27 AM
958 Views
I think you're leaving out some important points.
- 04/02/2012 03:40:48 PM
900 Views
Ah, the good ol' silent majority.
- 04/02/2012 07:32:29 PM
862 Views
So which moron is feeding you this crap?
- 04/02/2012 10:27:15 PM
898 Views
It worries me when we think alike....
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
924 Views
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
924 Views
Brain waves at 8 weeks are a myth.
- 05/02/2012 08:46:06 PM
1033 Views
"brain function... appears to be reliably present in the fetus at about eight weeks' gestation."
- 05/02/2012 10:42:35 PM
933 Views
Oh please.
- 05/02/2012 11:13:50 PM
901 Views
Re: Oh please yourself.
- 06/02/2012 09:15:26 PM
791 Views
Quite a telling reply.
- 07/02/2012 04:38:20 AM
848 Views
Re: I quite agree.
- 08/02/2012 06:03:23 PM
1014 Views
You're taking an issue of objective facts and treating it like a day of playground gossip.
- 09/02/2012 03:47:06 AM
906 Views
No, your source, in which there is very little that is objective, did that for me.
- 11/02/2012 02:59:45 AM
930 Views
I see you have continued to provide no factual arguments.
- 14/02/2012 04:53:28 AM
1143 Views
I presented factual rebuttals.
- 19/02/2012 01:56:45 AM
947 Views
You continue to miss the point.
- 23/02/2012 10:22:24 PM
1034 Views
No, I got the point: You expect me to accept a heavily biased, partisan and combative "source."
- 07/03/2012 01:47:37 AM
952 Views
The claim of brain waves at 8 weeks is still unsupported by evidence, i.e. a myth.
- 15/03/2012 09:16:14 PM
998 Views
Well, yes.
- 04/02/2012 11:14:47 PM
960 Views
A silent majority may as well not exist, if it has no tangible effects.
- 05/02/2012 12:54:34 AM
901 Views
You ignoring it is not the same thing as it having no tangible effect.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:36 AM
997 Views
Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 04/02/2012 08:25:49 PM
986 Views
Re: Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:28 AM
883 Views
If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 08:42:17 AM
739 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 10:04:59 PM
901 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 06/02/2012 08:57:38 PM
879 Views
I'm done discussing my use of the term "oppression." The Tim Ryan stuff is interesting, though.
- 07/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
972 Views
Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 08/02/2012 06:01:32 PM
1053 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 09/02/2012 05:30:58 AM
938 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 11/02/2012 02:58:00 AM
972 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 14/02/2012 04:29:08 AM
1022 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 19/02/2012 01:54:30 AM
955 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 23/02/2012 10:59:32 PM
1236 Views
There are problems with the implants
- 03/02/2012 01:42:55 AM
927 Views
Any form of birth control doesn't work for everyone, though.
- 03/02/2012 02:37:00 AM
930 Views
Oh yes, I totally agree! My point is just that there are some barriers to handing out implants 
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
435 Views
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
435 Views
What on earth does that have to do with anything?
- 03/02/2012 01:47:42 AM
861 Views
I was actually kinda with you until you closed with that anathema I condemned in my response to rt.
- 03/02/2012 01:39:06 PM
879 Views
I agree that they have made Beast Cancer a cult but splitting with PP is just smart
- 02/02/2012 05:39:49 PM
1034 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 06:00:17 PM
830 Views
yes she is going to have to piss off one group or the other
- 02/02/2012 06:12:31 PM
908 Views
Right
- 02/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
946 Views
it is a judgment call and I hope her decision is based on more than my guesses
- 02/02/2012 06:53:50 PM
827 Views
Do you see a way Komen could have avoided pissing off one side?
- 02/02/2012 06:55:36 PM
919 Views
No, I don't. I don't believe I said that?
- 02/02/2012 07:53:50 PM
822 Views
You didn't; I inferred it from the way you phrased that ("if she HAS to..."). Sorry.
- 02/02/2012 08:06:11 PM
896 Views
I know I'm not always clear.
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
906 Views
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
906 Views
Just curious...
- 02/02/2012 10:07:49 PM
873 Views
Not at all.
- 02/02/2012 10:24:19 PM
929 Views
Not at all?
- 02/02/2012 10:32:31 PM
849 Views
No.
- 02/02/2012 10:47:04 PM
799 Views
My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 02/02/2012 11:17:24 PM
898 Views
Re: My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 03/02/2012 12:08:01 AM
895 Views
wow that may be the worst advice I had in weeks
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
836 Views
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
836 Views
Ooor, the best.
- 03/02/2012 12:25:56 AM
828 Views
ok now you are just being mean *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:46:12 AM
556 Views
The thread was going too well - I thought we needed the meanness. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 11:30:39 AM
505 Views
Never having heard of any of those except PP, my opinion may not be the most relevant...
- 02/02/2012 08:32:48 PM
972 Views
You don't know stuff.
- 02/02/2012 08:43:38 PM
930 Views
I know the stuff that matters. 
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
835 Views
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
835 Views
they may also be a afraid that PP will go the way of ACORN
- 02/02/2012 11:04:16 PM
972 Views
"Accused" of = unfounded slander.
- 03/02/2012 12:13:30 AM
990 Views
did you notice I called tactic disgusting? That doesn't mean it isn't effective
- 03/02/2012 12:45:10 AM
901 Views
The investigation by Congress is well-known to be specious. It's the House GOP abusing their power. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:41:58 AM
612 Views
This is so foreign a debate for me
- 02/02/2012 10:16:15 PM
945 Views
*NM*
Re: stuff
- 03/02/2012 09:18:53 AM
853 Views
I'm sorry, but what're we talking about when we're talking about "cancer"
- 03/02/2012 12:49:34 PM
866 Views
Obviously not adenocarcinoma, no.
- 04/02/2012 07:36:06 AM
894 Views
I"m not that fussed. I'm just generally leary of research that has results like that
- 04/02/2012 08:35:04 PM
850 Views
Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 10:54:34 PM
920 Views
Re: Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 11:03:32 PM
858 Views
After a little more digging I have to say you are probably right.
- 03/02/2012 02:23:14 AM
805 Views
They restored funding incidentally
- 03/02/2012 05:43:47 PM
820 Views
Unless I've missed it
- 03/02/2012 05:56:15 PM
915 Views
You must have missed it then
- 03/02/2012 07:07:13 PM
834 Views
If you're referring to Cannoli
- 03/02/2012 07:19:25 PM
972 Views
Multiple was not an accidental choice of words
- 03/02/2012 11:46:30 PM
859 Views
Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 12:41:42 AM
880 Views
Re: Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 01:53:25 AM
1082 Views
well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1022 Views
Re: well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:29:34 PM
802 Views
I do wonder a bit which lawmakers Fox thinks "pressured" Komen.
- 03/02/2012 08:29:50 PM
823 Views
Beyond the 26 senators, I'd imagine rumor of the more reliable sort
- 03/02/2012 08:46:31 PM
907 Views
Well, if they wrote AS senators rather than friends of Nancy Brinker, that probably qualifies.
- 03/02/2012 10:24:11 PM
943 Views
Judge for yourself
- 04/02/2012 12:01:06 AM
957 Views
Well, a public letter makes whether they signed it "Sen. so-and-so" irrelevant: It is political.
- 04/02/2012 04:07:20 PM
892 Views
are you trying to disprove the study you posted?
- 03/02/2012 09:20:12 PM
951 Views
To me, it depends on the nature of the contact, which I have not dug enough to discover.
- 03/02/2012 10:43:45 PM
864 Views
you admit you have no incite into what happened
- 04/02/2012 04:27:17 AM
862 Views
Actually, it looks like Komens new VP (and former GOP GA gubernatorial candidate) had the incite.
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
921 Views
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
921 Views
educated guess don't work when you are tinfoil hat wearing kool-aid drinker
- 04/02/2012 09:33:49 PM
813 Views