How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course.
Joel Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM
I mean he really thought this would fly? If he doesn't change it then those "activist" judges will because it is a blatant violation of the separation between church and state. I am no fan of religion overall and I reject the idea that Obama wants some kind of "war" against religion - that idea is just stupid rhetoric - but moves like this are just mind boggling. They reaffirm to me why I have decided I won't be voting for him again.
What is your plan B? It is not as if we can expect much better from the real Romney (to the extent there is one) than from the Democratic clone of him.
That is setting aside my incredulity at anyone being satisfied with Romney; we know less about how he would govern than we did about Obama in 2008, even though Romney has been in national politics longer. Mitt makes Obama look firm and open by comparison.
However, if both major parties nominate awful candidates, the solution is to seek, support and campaign for a better one, regardless of party, not surrender the government to whichever of those awful candidates everyone else picks. That is how we got into this mess in the first place, and the biggest obstacle to getting out of it.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up
09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM
- 1903 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again.
09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM
- 930 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor
10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM
- 819 Views
In general, I disagree with that view, but not in this particular case.
11/02/2012 02:02:42 AM
- 1053 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well.
09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM
- 1000 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources!
*NM*
09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM
- 667 Views

Wanting both parties to be hit by a bus does not make one non-partisan.
09/02/2012 10:05:28 PM
- 884 Views

You lost all credibility in the first line of your post.
09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM
- 944 Views
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM*
09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM
- 556 Views
It's one thing to have a bias.
09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM
- 985 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms.
09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM
- 797 Views
The Catholic Church wants to eliminate the birth control coverage requirement entirely.
10/02/2012 12:24:01 AM
- 1107 Views
Sounds like they just do not want Catholics directly financing; great argument for public healthcare
10/02/2012 02:27:36 AM
- 1051 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly.
10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM
- 1806 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention?
10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM
- 2250 Views

If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote.
10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM
- 2293 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course.
11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM
- 2105 Views
No everynametaken this is not unconsitutional according to the first ammendment
11/02/2012 12:14:29 AM
- 2102 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end.
10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM
- 2346 Views
He is already preparing to cave.
10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM
- 2338 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said.
10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM
- 2119 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved.
10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM
- 2338 Views
Yup, the cave already happened.....you could have set your watch to this! *NM*
10/02/2012 05:00:02 PM
- 1753 Views
Actually, no, I could not; I expected it to take another week or two.
11/02/2012 01:27:31 AM
- 2216 Views
No, you don't have to buy it from insurers. You get it for free, just like everyone else will. *NM*
10/02/2012 09:55:53 PM
- 1893 Views
"The employees can then buy the coverage directly from an insurer."
11/02/2012 01:25:52 AM
- 2346 Views
Then that article is wrong.
11/02/2012 01:43:40 AM
- 2287 Views
Two days ago the White House said it would not back down from requiring school/hospital compliance.
11/02/2012 01:57:50 AM
- 2266 Views
So in summary... the article you posted was wrong.
11/02/2012 02:18:00 AM
- 1824 Views
To soon to tell, but if you think so feel free to demand a correction from them.
11/02/2012 03:12:40 AM
- 1045 Views
Losing the exchanges is a pretty big loss
11/02/2012 03:30:15 AM
- 964 Views
So they refuse to cover it for the next two years, then do an about face in 2014.
11/02/2012 03:57:53 AM
- 1131 Views
If Aetna does not provide the free contraception as part of the compromise
11/02/2012 02:46:14 AM
- 815 Views
Yeah, I saw that; if Aetna does not do as Obama says by 2014 they lose out on free profits then.
11/02/2012 03:13:36 AM
- 874 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions?
10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM
- 898 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs.
10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM
- 1084 Views
Money is not the same as speech!
10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM
- 804 Views
And actions are different from both—until others are expected to pay for ones actions.
11/02/2012 12:53:40 AM
- 1073 Views
No it isn't Joel, empirically you are dead wrong
10/02/2012 11:24:19 PM
- 1051 Views
I do not see how requiring private entities do it instead of the feds is "least restrictive way."
11/02/2012 12:53:22 AM
- 1059 Views
Catholic Charities of Sacramento Inc. v. Superior Court
11/02/2012 01:21:46 AM
- 967 Views
"the Court found that it wasn't a religious organization, it was just a non-profit corporation."
11/02/2012 01:36:33 AM
- 840 Views
One last point
10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM
- 1146 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes.
11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM
- 919 Views
You argument does not make sense
11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM
- 798 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency.
11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM
- 917 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality
11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM
- 1034 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money?
11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM
- 992 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money?
11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM
- 2217 Views
In other words, I could.
11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM
- 728 Views
You believe it can't help people since it is not single payer? *NM*
11/02/2012 04:31:13 AM
- 574 Views
Since you answered this in your other response I will just adress it there. *MN*
11/02/2012 05:59:37 AM
- 985 Views
Some more points
11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM
- 1048 Views
Sex is not a necessity either.
11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM
- 1007 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a
in it )
11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM
- 1033 Views

Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained.
11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM
- 966 Views
The polls disagree with you.
11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM
- 905 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls.
11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM
- 959 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway
11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
- 1080 Views
Frankly, I hope Obamacare DOES die, just not because of the public mandate.
11/02/2012 07:18:04 AM
- 970 Views
I haven't really heard about it outside of this post, so the negative exposure can't be too bad.
11/02/2012 05:56:58 PM
- 768 Views
There seems to be plenty of Hell raising over it, but you are in the States and I am not.
11/02/2012 07:55:51 PM
- 804 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is
11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM
- 960 Views
Understood.
11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM
- 897 Views
mmm...
11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM
- 957 Views
The man talked about during the campaign was the one elected with a mandate.
12/02/2012 02:28:15 AM
- 1105 Views
I think Obama (for once) was far more clever you give him credit for...
15/02/2012 05:11:10 PM
- 1182 Views
Surrendering on liberal issues then blaming Republicans is not just Obamas strategy, but his POLICY.
15/02/2012 07:23:04 PM
- 1019 Views