Active Users:1687 Time:05/05/2026 10:57:01 AM
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course. Joel Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM
I mean he really thought this would fly? If he doesn't change it then those "activist" judges will because it is a blatant violation of the separation between church and state. I am no fan of religion overall and I reject the idea that Obama wants some kind of "war" against religion - that idea is just stupid rhetoric - but moves like this are just mind boggling. They reaffirm to me why I have decided I won't be voting for him again.

What is your plan B? It is not as if we can expect much better from the real Romney (to the extent there is one) than from the Democratic clone of him.

That is setting aside my incredulity at anyone being satisfied with Romney; we know less about how he would govern than we did about Obama in 2008, even though Romney has been in national politics longer. Mitt makes Obama look firm and open by comparison.

However, if both major parties nominate awful candidates, the solution is to seek, support and campaign for a better one, regardless of party, not surrender the government to whichever of those awful candidates everyone else picks. That is how we got into this mess in the first place, and the biggest obstacle to getting out of it.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up - 09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM 2007 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again. - 09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM 1039 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor - 10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM 949 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well. - 09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM 1118 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources! *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM 712 Views
Is there really such a thing? *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:11:30 PM 616 Views
You lost all credibility in the first line of your post. - 09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM 1066 Views
The subject line didn't help. *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:04:11 PM 659 Views
But it added some flair to the discussion! *NM* - 09/02/2012 07:46:47 PM 597 Views
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM 596 Views
It's one thing to have a bias. - 09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM 1108 Views
Some would say putting a spotlight on it is more honest. *NM* - 09/02/2012 09:34:17 PM 572 Views
Ah, the Rupert Murdoch School of Objectivity. - 09/02/2012 10:15:57 PM 1026 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms. - 09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM 890 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly. - 10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM 1913 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention? - 10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM 2359 Views
If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote. - 10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM 2409 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course. - 11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM 2211 Views
Bullshit. - 11/02/2012 04:29:31 AM 2567 Views
A vote for no one is a vote for more BS. - 11/02/2012 05:55:11 AM 2295 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end. - 10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM 2465 Views
He is already preparing to cave. - 10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM 2432 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said. - 10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM 2224 Views
"And here I thought he was just another politician." - 10/02/2012 01:29:36 PM 2314 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved. - 10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM 2443 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions? - 10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM 1008 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs. - 10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM 1179 Views
Money is not the same as speech! - 10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM 905 Views
No it isn't Joel, empirically you are dead wrong - 10/02/2012 11:24:19 PM 1177 Views
One last point - 10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM 1264 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes. - 11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM 1005 Views
You argument does not make sense - 11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM 887 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency. - 11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM 1010 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality - 11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM 1155 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM 1130 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM 2337 Views
In other words, I could. - 11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM 844 Views
Some more points - 11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM 1152 Views
Sex is not a necessity either. - 11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM 1138 Views
I can't believe you just said that - 11/02/2012 04:30:12 AM 926 Views
The widespread inability to believe that is deeply worrisome. - 11/02/2012 06:33:01 AM 1142 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a in it ) - 11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM 1173 Views
Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained. - 11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM 1076 Views
The polls disagree with you. - 11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM 1007 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls. - 11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM 1096 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway - 11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM 1178 Views
I haven't really heard about it outside of this post, so the negative exposure can't be too bad. - 11/02/2012 05:56:58 PM 886 Views
you have, sort of. - 11/02/2012 08:23:25 PM 1144 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is - 11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM 1050 Views
Nossy that was not Joel, that was me - 11/02/2012 01:56:39 PM 1064 Views
I know that. - 11/02/2012 03:23:32 PM 1108 Views
Understood. - 11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM 998 Views
mmm... - 11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM 1082 Views

Reply to Message