There's a clear difference. First, Jesus used the term "bridegroom" as an allegory, and the term "bridegroom" and "bride" are totally different in all the relevant languages from "husband" and "wife". In Coptic that would require using "šeleet" instead of "(s)hime" (the "s" appearing in some dialects, not in others).
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Tom on 19/09/2012 at 11:36:49 PM
So, about this silly "Jesus' wife" story making the rounds...
19/09/2012 10:55:55 PM
- 1328 Views
That's right! Jesus' position on marriage was "One man, no woman." *NM*
19/09/2012 11:05:55 PM
- 659 Views
What is the context? The canonical bible says Christ has a wife: The Church.
19/09/2012 11:25:19 PM
- 965 Views
Oh please...don't confuse "wife" with "bride"
19/09/2012 11:35:09 PM
- 935 Views
What word do the Prophets use for Israels relationship to God?
20/09/2012 12:38:20 AM
- 914 Views
BRIDE
20/09/2012 03:39:30 PM
- 901 Views
I love your last two sentences. They're a really nice description.
*NM*
20/09/2012 07:58:19 PM
- 445 Views

That makes sense for an eternal God, but sounds like a wife who remains a bride.
20/09/2012 08:56:07 PM
- 971 Views
It's "bride" in the Old Testament as well.
20/09/2012 09:48:37 PM
- 915 Views
The distinction is important for preserving the newlywed condition, but not for this fragment.
20/09/2012 11:21:52 PM
- 948 Views
Two things why it is important
20/09/2012 04:24:37 AM
- 889 Views
Did someone hit you over the head? "Two things why it is important"? Really?
20/09/2012 03:50:02 PM
- 978 Views
Something I forgot to ask you about last night: What is your take on Daniels messianic prophecy?
20/09/2012 09:21:32 PM
- 887 Views
I don't get that at all. "And will be no more", or "And will have nothing" is better.
20/09/2012 10:13:20 PM
- 846 Views
It is the King James text, which I have never heard anyone call heretical.
20/09/2012 11:15:54 PM
- 927 Views
The King James Bible is aesthetically pleasing but a bad translation.
21/09/2012 12:03:00 AM
- 861 Views
I like the NKJV because it tries to include all ambiguities.
21/09/2012 12:47:38 AM
- 935 Views
There is a very good reason no one dismissed the illegitmate gospels as illegitimate until 180 AD:
20/09/2012 09:15:05 PM
- 854 Views
The Gospel of Thomas was written before 180 AD.
20/09/2012 09:33:44 PM
- 845 Views
What is the oldest extant text of or reference to it?
20/09/2012 11:11:03 PM
- 918 Views
The Oxyrhynchus fragments were dated to c. 200 AD, and they are copies
21/09/2012 12:18:33 AM
- 837 Views
I would buy 200 AD, of course.
21/09/2012 12:58:32 AM
- 899 Views
It's not about "buying" it - it's essentially proven at that point.
21/09/2012 03:26:50 AM
- 870 Views
Yes; all I meant was that I never disputed a date around 200 AD.
22/09/2012 12:25:41 AM
- 888 Views
I don't think any of the gospels were written by their purported authors.
22/09/2012 03:36:32 AM
- 801 Views
Not even Mark or Luke?
22/09/2012 01:21:24 PM
- 847 Views
Well, but everyone knew Peter didn't speak Greek
22/09/2012 09:46:57 PM
- 788 Views
True, but everyone also knew Paul spoke it fluently, and he would have been an ideal choice.
24/09/2012 06:20:22 AM
- 851 Views
Some people did "lie big".
24/09/2012 02:11:58 PM
- 874 Views
I forgot about (or possibly repressed memories of) the Gnostics "Gospel" of Peter.
24/09/2012 11:26:43 PM
- 956 Views
I'm not trying to defend Gnosticism doctrinally, but...
24/09/2012 11:51:40 PM
- 915 Views
I am not relying SOLELY (or chiefly) on popularity though.
25/09/2012 02:21:01 AM
- 896 Views
The Gnostic response would be:
25/09/2012 06:01:58 AM
- 814 Views
That just sounds like more conspiracy allegations based on desire rather than evidence.
25/09/2012 07:15:06 AM
- 969 Views
The issue of evidence for Gnosticism would make this thread unnecessarily long.
25/09/2012 07:28:22 PM
- 808 Views
What about those who postulate a mid-to-late 1st century composition?
22/09/2012 02:21:18 AM
- 912 Views
Elaine Pagels ceased to be an impartial academic a long time ago.
22/09/2012 03:41:41 AM
- 871 Views
Suspected as much, but wanted to see if you thought so as well
22/09/2012 03:47:05 AM
- 1011 Views
Let's not get started on Funk
22/09/2012 09:48:05 PM
- 806 Views
don't these people have anything better to do?
20/09/2012 11:39:35 PM
- 910 Views
Clearly not.
22/09/2012 12:27:29 AM
- 746 Views