What! That is ridiculous. They do not seek to impose upon the rest of the world their views, they simply want their views accepted, is that wrong? Is it so wrong to make a stand for what you believe, which is really all a same-sex marriage is. They can't just say their married because 1)there is no legitamacy there, everyone else gets a real marriage, and they have their rights based on their views and 2)they are making a stand by getting married. They aren't saying that the rest of the world has to be like them, just that they want acceptance for their views. They (as evidenced by yourself) face enough prejedice as is.



Ok, that really doesn't make any sense. And goes against a major concept of Enlightenment philosophy upon which America was founded. That is, the majority gets its way without restricting the rights of the minorities. It is a violation of absolutely no one's rights for this girl to go to the dance. No one's. But denying her, and canceling the dance is denying everyone's rights. And even in the hypothetical situation that they just denied her access, that would be denying the minority rights because it is in the will of a majority.

Take a hypothetical example of a dance in a racist community in America in the last century. A caucasian person wants to bring along his/her african american girl/boy friend. And because there are so many people in the area that are opposed to interracial marriage, they cancel the dance because it goes against school policy or whatever you were talking about up there.

Is that right? Is that fair? If you think so than no one can even argue with you because you have morals that were outdated in 1900.

And your example about drugs is ridiculous. That impedes on other peoples possiblity to have fun, whereas one couple in a whole dance won't change anything.