You raised some other good points there, with which I basically agree, and yes I'm strictly talking about the clothes, I have absolutely no prob with her raising a fuss about the gay aspect, which is not to say I have a prob with the schoolboard fighting it either, just that I view that as a legitimate battle either way and I do not view the dress code as one and I don't think it should be involved, but it happens to basically be the entire premise of the legal suit. I don't blame her for doing this, I would say I respect her for it, except I don't, because I'm assuming she's not old enough and mature enough to fully appreciate the consequences that she might face. If she really did go into this with eyes wide open then she has my sincerest respect regardless of whether I agree with her cause, but she's young, so probably not, and for the same reason, the disruption she's causing is not something I blame her for because I think she was too young to realize the consequences. That same youth excuses her from the moral ambiguity involved with how most of the consequences are happening to other children. So even if I viewed this as petty, I wouldn't be angry at her over it.
I don't disagree about the concept of a symbolic victory. I thought about that as well. But honestly, if you read what you just wrote (and I usually HATE when people throw in this type of comment, but...), doesn't that feel a little "if you sit in the back of the bus, we'll let you ride" to you?
Oh, I thought about it myself when writing it, however, these days people protest with little consequence and many who protest are so within their shell of zeal that they don't even acknowledge the collateral damage caused by it. If a firefight breaks out between the good guys and the bad guys, and a bunch of innocent bystanders get caught in the middle, it's a bit hard to just say "Blessed are they who are persecuted for the sake of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." and move on. That's not to say you shouldn't have done it, but acknowledging your part in their suffering is - to me - a pretty big factor in deciding who the good guys and the bad guys are. And sometimes it is better to fall back and try another day when less collateral damage is going to result, sometimes not, you have to make a decision and deal with the consequences, you can't ignore them.
Sometimes - and I am not saying this was one of those times - you've got to say 'yeah, I'm right and they're wrong, but pursuing this isn't right'. So between Rosa Parks and PETA-extremists bashing in some lab guards head to free the lab rats who then run free while infected with a disease and bit locals, there is a big swath of grey. I hardly think she's anywhere near the latter, but I don't think she's Rosa Parks either.
I don't disagree about the concept of a symbolic victory. I thought about that as well. But honestly, if you read what you just wrote (and I usually HATE when people throw in this type of comment, but...), doesn't that feel a little "if you sit in the back of the bus, we'll let you ride" to you?
Oh, I thought about it myself when writing it, however, these days people protest with little consequence and many who protest are so within their shell of zeal that they don't even acknowledge the collateral damage caused by it. If a firefight breaks out between the good guys and the bad guys, and a bunch of innocent bystanders get caught in the middle, it's a bit hard to just say "Blessed are they who are persecuted for the sake of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." and move on. That's not to say you shouldn't have done it, but acknowledging your part in their suffering is - to me - a pretty big factor in deciding who the good guys and the bad guys are. And sometimes it is better to fall back and try another day when less collateral damage is going to result, sometimes not, you have to make a decision and deal with the consequences, you can't ignore them.
Sometimes - and I am not saying this was one of those times - you've got to say 'yeah, I'm right and they're wrong, but pursuing this isn't right'. So between Rosa Parks and PETA-extremists bashing in some lab guards head to free the lab rats who then run free while infected with a disease and bit locals, there is a big swath of grey. I hardly think she's anywhere near the latter, but I don't think she's Rosa Parks either.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date
11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM
- 1679 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM*
12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM
- 272 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM
- 874 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM
- 703 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM
- 712 Views
What???
12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM
- 779 Views
Actually...
12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM
- 792 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense.
12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM
- 717 Views
That analogy is not apt.
12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM
- 767 Views
Er...
12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM
- 654 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt.
12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM
- 716 Views
...
12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM
- 642 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt."
12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM
- 649 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that.
12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM
- 705 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say?
12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM
- 599 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt.
12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM
- 660 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong.
12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM
- 688 Views
Re: This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
12/03/2010 02:31:06 PM
- 732 Views
Why don't you show me where I said marriage is holy OR made a religious argument, you imbecile?
12/03/2010 10:32:42 PM
- 697 Views
actually, i thought i read that it was because she wanted to wear a tux instead of a dress
12/03/2010 02:46:00 AM
- 726 Views
Kind of a different can of worms then
12/03/2010 03:20:35 AM
- 661 Views
What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
14/03/2010 01:24:47 AM
- 661 Views
Hmm. Apparently it is legal to discriminate upon the basis of gender. Imagine that.
14/03/2010 02:45:51 AM
- 638 Views
It kind of makes sense, given the highly arbitrary and stereotypical nature of gender.
14/03/2010 03:35:44 AM
- 569 Views
Re: What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
15/03/2010 02:01:00 AM
- 689 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO
12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM
- 737 Views
Maybe.
12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM
- 733 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters"
12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM
- 661 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here.
12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM
- 632 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt...
12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM
- 692 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM
- 663 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM
- 662 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under
12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM
- 558 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under
13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM
- 705 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux"
15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM
- 598 Views
For the record...
12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM
- 646 Views
Re: For the record...
12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM
- 685 Views
Re: For the record...
12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM
- 709 Views
Re: For the record...
12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM
- 685 Views
No no, I know how you feel. I'm just disinclined to have sympathy for the school.
12/03/2010 11:28:35 PM
- 561 Views
Alternatively, I have little sympathy for the school, I just don't have much for her either
12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
- 673 Views

Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit?
12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM
- 659 Views
Regardless of "rights" invovled, I don't see why she shouldn't be able to go as she pleases.
12/03/2010 05:25:31 PM
- 698 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend
12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM
- 776 Views
Another thing I think people should remember -
12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM
- 772 Views
One point though
12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM
- 701 Views
Re: One point though
12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM
- 759 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance
12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM
- 586 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much?
13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM
- 558 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else
13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM
- 624 Views
It does
13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM
- 604 Views
Re: It does
13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM
- 561 Views
I typically agree with you
13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM
- 660 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM
- 599 Views
No, it should not
14/03/2010 12:33:56 AM
- 826 Views
Re: No, it should not
14/03/2010 01:16:33 AM
- 727 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM
- 662 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM
- 540 Views
He wasn't neccessarily advocating it. He was translating what they were doing into something that
16/03/2010 01:37:59 AM
- 632 Views
I'd argue that that kind of hypocrisy is invaluable in today's world, actually.
16/03/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 602 Views
Re: It does
13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM
- 625 Views
Re: It does
13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM
- 558 Views
Re: It does
13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM
- 751 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM*
12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM
- 434 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened
12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM
- 549 Views