Active Users:2331 Time:18/06/2026 10:05:23 AM
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM
But I'll recap the general jist of what was said:

-Cuendillar is presumably completely inflexible, therefore we'd need to make it similar to chain-mail, i.e. links, to make small pieces that are flexible with respect to each other.

-This appears difficult, because the individual cuendillar pieces could not be touching when merged together (although I'm sure they could simply interleave flows of Air and it wouldn't be all that hard).

-The armor might not provide that much protection to hard hits, but it would definitely help protect against punctures.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1753 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1218 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 633 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1149 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1219 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 587 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1126 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1295 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1087 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 633 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1099 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1258 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 552 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1351 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1145 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1129 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1133 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1138 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1217 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 1082 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1134 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 1016 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1191 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 996 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 1010 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1117 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 1014 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 987 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 690 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1100 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 1071 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 1051 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1157 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 1029 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 986 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1122 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1100 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 1055 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 982 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1123 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 990 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1157 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1317 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 1116 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 997 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 978 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1178 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 1011 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 1013 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1184 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 1034 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 1019 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1123 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 612 Views

Reply to Message