Active Users:721 Time:03/08/2026 04:03:38 PM
which way is it? LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
You can't insist that an idea is possible despite what's going on/limitations in the books and then say it would be superior because of those limitations.

If we're going to work with the assumption that it's suddenly possible for the AS to experiment with and manufacture heartstone armor in the tiny amount of time remaining before The Last Battle, then I'm going to work with the assumption that Aes Sedai that can suddenly accomplish this task can be countered with channelers of similar skill/intelligence.

Additionally, there are a great number of channelers in the Last Battle that aren't going to be Aes Sedai. And some, like the Seanchan, are going to have great tactical minds behind them. It's not like the channelers themselves have to think of the concepts anyway
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1780 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1239 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 648 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1179 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1253 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 613 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1149 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1323 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1113 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 659 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1131 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1283 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 568 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1382 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1175 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1153 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1161 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1170 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1246 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 1108 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1160 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 1044 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1220 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 1025 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 1033 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1150 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 1050 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 1013 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 706 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1130 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 1101 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 1081 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1186 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 1060 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 1020 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1149 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1138 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 1083 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 1025 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1173 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 1024 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1192 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1346 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 1146 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 1025 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 1013 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1204 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 1041 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 1045 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1210 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 1057 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 1052 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1170 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 634 Views

Reply to Message