RJ never really went into the OP defying properties of C. The fireballs are pure weaves of fire, no weave, no fire, no heat. We also do not know about the heat transferance properties of C. For all we know it could pass heat like tin foil, or be so resistant to it you could hold it in your hand while someone plays a palsma torch over it. We just don't know. Lightning might or might not be effective. C started as iron, but is it still ferrous? If not, just how perfect an insulator is it? It could be such a high value insulator that lighting will not strike it, again we just don't know.
An interesting debate might be what would happen if someone wearing C armor got hit by balefire. Balefire is pure OP that burns you out of the pattern backwards, but C is immune to the OP. Would it just wash off you, or could (theoretically) a channeler use enough OP to burn far enough back to before you put it on, or before the armor was converted from iron...
My position is simple. C armor would not be hard to make, making it would not violate any of the oaths, and C armor is substantially better than normal armor. just how much better is something we can go round and round on because only RJ could have given a definitive answer; but he never did.
An interesting debate might be what would happen if someone wearing C armor got hit by balefire. Balefire is pure OP that burns you out of the pattern backwards, but C is immune to the OP. Would it just wash off you, or could (theoretically) a channeler use enough OP to burn far enough back to before you put it on, or before the armor was converted from iron...
My position is simple. C armor would not be hard to make, making it would not violate any of the oaths, and C armor is substantially better than normal armor. just how much better is something we can go round and round on because only RJ could have given a definitive answer; but he never did.
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
- 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
1753 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
1218 Views
I suppose I am on a...
- 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
1149 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
1244 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
1295 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
- 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
1351 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
- 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
1217 Views
Ummm, Warders...
- 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
1082 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
- 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
1134 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
1016 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
1191 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
997 Views
which way is it?
- 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
1010 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
- 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
1117 Views
That's really not my point.
- 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
1014 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
- 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
1100 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
- 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
1071 Views
Not nesecarrily
- 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
1051 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
- 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
1158 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
- 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
1030 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
- 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
987 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
1051 Views
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
1051 Views
Not accurate
- 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
1122 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
- 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
1100 Views
I disagree
- 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
1055 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
- 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
983 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
- 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
1123 Views
nope
- 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
991 Views
*Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
1157 Views
Re: *Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
1318 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
1116 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
1025 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
997 Views
Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
979 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
1178 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
- 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
1011 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
- 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
1184 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
- 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
1034 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
- 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
1019 Views
