Active Users:633 Time:06/11/2026 01:18:25 AM
My point is HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM
That increased survivability is increased survivability. Your argument, taken to the extreme would result in everyone in a battle to just say "whatever" and stab themselves because nothing could protect them from every potential death so they might as well just get it over with.

Sorry, most people's attitudes don't work that way, and I suspect neither do yours. In a conflict situation I am going to take every resonable advantage I can lay my hands on "..to make the other dumb son of a bitch die for his." as Patton supposedly said. C armor is just one more (relatively) simple way to help make that happen.

I hope some sort of C armor makes an appearance in the final story even if it is just Egwene changing Gawyn's shield on the eve of battle with the customary "Oh, I should have thought of this earlier." that we have seen other times.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1856 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1304 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 684 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1260 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1317 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 666 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1217 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1396 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1193 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 713 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1191 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1338 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 603 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1452 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1246 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1219 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1220 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1228 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1318 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 1182 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1233 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 1122 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1295 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 1086 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 1098 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1227 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 1111 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 1076 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 739 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1189 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 1187 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 1149 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1245 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 1118 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 1088 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1228 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1211 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 1149 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 1094 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1279 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 1093 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1277 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1418 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 1233 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 1088 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 1096 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1270 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 1123 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 1115 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1272 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 1140 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 1121 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1251 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 670 Views

Reply to Message