Active Users:2330 Time:18/06/2026 10:07:14 AM
Re: My thought was always about weapons. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM
OK, I'm confused, are you talking about making weapons of Cuendillar or armor? Armor is not a weapon and should, therefore, cause no problem for the A.S. to make. Too bad Eggy couldn't make a C-dar axe or sword, that'd be very handy, indeed.


less than you would think. A sword needs some flexibility to funciton properly (absorbing the shock from srikes and blocks). The only real benefit of a C sword would be no nicking or sharpening, but using one for long would be very dificult as your wrists and forearms would probably give out.

The cutting power of the blade is still restricted to the keeness of the edge (if you can take it molecular, then we have a whole new ballbame) and the strength/technique of the arm. Wolverine's "razor sharp" claws cutting through steel like it is butter simply because they are unbreakable is not how it would really work.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1753 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1218 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 633 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1150 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1219 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 587 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1127 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1296 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1087 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 634 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1099 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1258 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 553 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1351 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1146 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1130 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1133 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1138 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1217 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 1083 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1134 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 1016 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1191 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 997 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 1010 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1117 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 1014 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 987 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 690 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1101 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 1071 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 1052 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1158 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 1030 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 987 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1122 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1101 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 1055 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 983 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1123 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 991 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1157 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1318 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 1116 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 997 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 979 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1178 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 1011 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 1014 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1184 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 1035 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 1020 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1124 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 612 Views

Reply to Message