Active Users:316 Time:04/05/2024 05:30:33 PM
Re: My thought was always about weapons. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM
OK, I'm confused, are you talking about making weapons of Cuendillar or armor? Armor is not a weapon and should, therefore, cause no problem for the A.S. to make. Too bad Eggy couldn't make a C-dar axe or sword, that'd be very handy, indeed.


less than you would think. A sword needs some flexibility to funciton properly (absorbing the shock from srikes and blocks). The only real benefit of a C sword would be no nicking or sharpening, but using one for long would be very dificult as your wrists and forearms would probably give out.

The cutting power of the blade is still restricted to the keeness of the edge (if you can take it molecular, then we have a whole new ballbame) and the strength/technique of the arm. Wolverine's "razor sharp" claws cutting through steel like it is butter simply because they are unbreakable is not how it would really work.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1327 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 772 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 414 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 683 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 763 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 373 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 660 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 877 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 667 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 417 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 655 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 760 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 350 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 843 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 714 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 679 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 683 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 727 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 777 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 619 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 661 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 585 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 729 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 568 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 579 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 669 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 571 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 568 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 495 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 658 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 609 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 627 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 725 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 576 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 586 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 662 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 667 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 624 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 532 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 668 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 534 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 666 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 843 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 574 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 529 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 682 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 577 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 579 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 737 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 575 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 547 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 612 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 390 Views

Reply to Message